Search for: "ECUADORIAN PLAINTIFFS" Results 161 - 180 of 219
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2011, 6:46 pm by Alison Frankel
The plaintiffs who won the enormous judgment for the oil company's alleged contamination of the Amazon River basis attempted a couple high-risk strategies to avert the injunction. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 11:45 am by Chad Bray
 Chevron has filed a separate racketeering lawsuit against the Ecuadorian plaintiff’s lawyers in the U.S., claiming they’re trying to extort and defraud the company. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:52 am by Michael D. Goldhaber
Appearing for the first time for plaintiffs lawyer Steven Donziger, John Keker told the court that he planned to look into "issues of assignment and recusal. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:07 pm by Chad Bray
The Ecuadorian plaintiffs have appealed the judgment, saying they are seeking a larger award. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:18 am by Dianne Saxe
For one thing, there might be some countries in the world, containing Chevron assets, willing to enforce an Ecuadorian court decision. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
In particular, we will see whether a U.S. court would be willing to enforce the Ecuadorian judgment over challenges to the adequacy of the Ecuadorian judiciary generally or to the conduct of the Ecuadorian court or the plaintiffs in the Ecuadorian action in this case specifically. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:57 pm by Corporate Action Network
When Chevron acquired Texaco in 2001, the Ecuadorian plaintiffs say, Chevron acceded to responsibility for the harm done. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 2:34 pm by Roger Alford
United States and international tribunals already have taken steps to bar enforcement of the Ecuadorian ruling. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 12:21 pm by Ashby Jones
The long and winding saga between Ecuadorian plaintiffs and Chevron Corp. took another big bend in the road on Monday. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 6:54 am by Michael D. Goldhaber
The unprecedented litigation over Chevron's alleged contamination of the Ecuadorian rainforest took a stunning turn Tuesday when Manhattan federal district judge Lewis Kaplan granted Chevron's request for a 14-day temporary restraining order against the Ecuadorian plaintiffs and their lawyers. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 6:04 am by CivPro Blogger
In the ongoing litigation between Chevron and plaintiffs in Ecuador, Judge Kaplan of the SDNY has already blocked enforcement of the Ecuadorian judgment in the U.S. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 3:35 pm by Carter Wood
See also Washington Times editorial, "An Ecuadorian racket. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 1:29 pm by WIMS
(UBR), engaged by the plaintiffs in the Ecuadorian case as a non-testifying environmental consultant. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 4:14 pm by Barry Barnett
  The panel noted that the district court's in camera review of the documents might show that the plaintiffs' lawyers engaged in conduct that furthered a fraud on the Ecuadorian court. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 5:30 am by Ted Folkman
The Ecuadoran plaintiffs made an interesting argument of statutory construction. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 5:30 am by Alison Frankel
The oil company wants a declaratory judgment that any award against it from the Ecuadorian court is unenforceable. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 3:29 pm by David Lat
[Cardozo Jurist]* RICO suave: Chevon turns the tables on those Ecuadorian environmental plaintiffs. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 3:23 pm by Roger Alford
" Among the co-conspirators are (1) environmental consultants; (2) Ecuadorian lawyers and plaintiffs; (3) U.S. law firms Patton Boggs, Motley Rice, and Kohn Swift & Graf; (4) and environmental activists Amazon Watch and Rainforest Action Network. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 9:04 am by Gideon
The plaintiffs also cite previously reported statistics about the issuance of traffic tickets. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 8:47 am by Michael D. Goldhaber
., talks about why he signed on to represent the plaintiffs in the Ecuadorian toxic tort suit against Chevron, despite a damaging ruling from a federal judge that found apparent evidence of fraud by plaintiffs attorneys. [read post]