Search for: "ENGLAND v. STATE"
Results 161 - 180
of 3,656
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2019, 7:25 am
Ethicon Ltd [1975] AC 396. [2] Campus Oil v Minister for Industry [1983] IR 38. [3] Okunade v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:19 am
The Supreme Court was careful to note that it is not possible to state a general rule as to whether or not an Order made by Her Majesty in Council is amenable to judicial review in the courts of England and Wales, given the wide variety of circumstances in which such Orders are made. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:05 pm
In the case of David Miranda v Secretary of State for the Home Department, the Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and three interveners ([2014] EWHC 255 (Admin)) the High Court rejected all the arguments supporting David Miranda’s application for judicial review of his detention at Heathrow Airport in August last year. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 2:58 pm
At Least, This November 2012 Article In The New England Journal Of Medicine Makes The Point That Something Needs To Be Done Soon, Rather Than Later (Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com) The June 2011 ruling by our United States Supreme Court in Pliva v. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 1:47 am
Secretary of State for Children, Schools & Families Johnston v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 3:51 am
Medtronic and Wyeth v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 3:17 pm
In his leading judgment Lord Justice Thorpe stated:"I would unhesitatingly conclude that the Marbella court was the more appropriate court having regard to the best interests of the children. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 9:15 am
District Judge England in the Eastern District of California dismissed the complaint captioned as Sugawara v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 3:18 pm
Braes of Doune Wind Farm (Scotland) Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 9:19 am
Syndicate 980 v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 4:41 pm
” A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] 1 AC 68, Lord Bingham. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:34 pm
V Holder (Ninth Cir. 2011) [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:00 am
It did so largely on the basis of its interpretation of Article 9(1) of Directive 89/104, the key wording of which is "has acquiesced, for a period of five successive years, in the use of a later trade mark registered in that Member State while being aware of such use". [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 2:52 pm
Rodd Electrotype Co. of New England, Inc., 328 N.E.2d 505 (1975)]...,, that is, a duty of “utmost good faith and loyalty,†id., quoting Cardullo v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 12:10 pm
The justices in the Court of Appeals of Maryland admitted it is unpopular but declined to change it in the 2013 hearing of Coleman v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 9:54 pm
C5 (UK) will be holding its 19th Forum on Biotech Patenting on October 6-7, 2010 in London, England. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:45 am
A recent judgment of the England and Wales High Court, Kaschke v Gray & Anor [2010] EWHC 690 (QB), dealt with a potential libel that occurred in a post on a blog, Labourhome.org, that opens its facilities to “Labour grassroots” to “discuss the issues important to them. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 8:06 am
R (o.t.a A and B) v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 10:27 am
The High Court decision in Alberta v Katanga dealt with two separate questions that are of interest. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 7:07 am
"The Higher Education Funding Council for England v Information Commissioner and Guardian News and Media Ltd (EA/2009/0036) [read post]
