Search for: "Eugene E Smith "
Results 161 - 180
of 244
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2015, 3:10 pm
See Smith v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 10:41 am
Smith (1990) has held that the Free Exercise Clause generally doesn’t mandate religious exemptions from generally applicable laws, it can be read as allowing such strict scrutiny in cases involving hybrid rights claims, such as free exercise plus parental rights, or, in this instance, free exercise plus the Second Amendment. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 2:10 pm
Smith and John Owens: [T]he government’s continued authorization of the [Big Mountain Jesus] statue on federal land does not violate the Establishment Clause. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 5:24 pm
” … [W]e [have] held[, for instance,] that a Jewish inmate had the right to a kosher diet and disposable utensils. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:35 pm
See, e.g., Colby & Smith, supra at 527; DAVID E. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 6:08 am
Smith (7th Cir. 1978); Tollett v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:00 am
Below the fold is Version 3.1 of the census of law prof Twitter users. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 4:44 am
Louis University Victor Fleischer vcfleischer San Diego John Flood JohnAFlood Univ College Dublin Sutherland David Fontana proffontana George Washington Pamela Foohey PamelaFoohey Indiana-Maurer Sheila Foster SheilaRFoster Fordham Cynthia Fountaine clfountaine Southern Illinois Gary Francione garylfrancione Rutgers-Newark Rosa Freedman GoonerDr Univ Birmingham (UK) Barry Friedman barryfriedman1 NYU Brett Frischmann BrettFrischmann Cardozo Jeanne Fromer JeanneFromer NYU Michael Froomkin mfroomkin… [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 3:01 am
El juez de circuito Eugene E. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 6:46 pm
Dempsey m2dempsey Villanova Stephen Diamond StephenFDiamond Santa Clara Darby Dickerson darbydickerson Texas Tech Amy Dillard adillard Baltimore Jim Dimitri profdimitri Indiana John DiPippa jmdipippa Arkansas-Little Rock Scott Dodson ProfDodson Hastings Randy Dryer medialawguy Utah Mary Dudziak marydudziak Emory Joel Eisen joeleisen Richmond Atiba Ellis atibaellis West Virginia Mairead Enright maireadenright Kent (UK) Jonathan Ezor ProfJonathan Touro Dave Fagundes Dave_Fagundes Soutwestern Joshua… [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 2:14 pm
But the plaintiff’s lawyer told me — in response to an e-mail from me — that the plaintiff seeks only to disclose his or her own thoughts and reactions to the evidence, not the other grand jurors’ reactions. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 5:25 pm
Senior Circuit Judge Eugene E. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 8:34 am
§ 230(e)(3) (emphasis added). [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
I blogged last week about Tracy Rifle & Pistol LLC. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 6:44 am
In Smith v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 4:38 am
This might not be the only referral coming from the Netherlands, Eleonora explains, as she seizes the opportunity to recap on what e-lending and digital exhaustion are about and why they are so hot now in the beloved European Union legal system. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 3:07 am
Moral rights over unpublished works appear to be the big issue here, Marie-Andrée explains.* The Copyright and Technology contest has now a winnerOn 1 October 2014 the London offices of Reed Smith LLP are hosting the 1-day Copyright and Technology conference, which promises to be very engaging and carries a discounted registration fee for IPKat readers. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:27 am
My students Nate Barrett, Charles Linehan, and Michael Smith worked on it, and New Jersey lawyer Daniel Schmutter of Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP was kind enough to agree to be pro bono local counsel — many thanks to him for that! [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
The result: a book praised by many of the papers who got the story wrong at the start, and sharply criticized by virtually every reviewer who knew anything about what occurred in Durham.With the Carrington and Evans lawsuits having concluded, and with the Cohan book consigned (to borrow Judge John E. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:19 am
Reading RFRA, as the Court does, to require extension of religion-based exemptions to for-profit corporations surely is not grounded in the pre-Smith precedent Congress sought to preserve. [read post]
