Search for: "Fisher v. District Court" Results 161 - 180 of 831
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2012, 6:33 am by Lyle Denniston
  It explains the case of Fisher v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 6:33 am by Gritsforbreakfast
But the Fourteenth Court of Appeals found that lineup was permissible in Fisher v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 7:05 am
Thomas Fisher, Kathleen Halloran, and George BehrensCase number: 07-cv-04483 (United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois)Case filed:August 9, 2007Qualifying Judgment/Order: May 29, 2013 6/19/2013 9/17/2013 More notices are listed in my previous post. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 12:50 am
LEXIS 38146 (ED WI, May 24, 2007), a Wisconsin federal district court reaffirmed its prior determination in the case that "substantial burden" under RLUIPA as one that makes religious exercise effectively impractiable.In Fisher v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 5:26 am by Nathaniel Sobel
” The authoritative precedent in compelled decryption cases is the Supreme Court’s decision in Fisher v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:28 am by David Gans
” This fight over Brown is sure to continue next Term, when the Justices consider Fisher v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 2:48 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The Court notes that Caldwell may still pursue his FCRA claim and Consumer Protection Law claim in an amended complaint in federal district court. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 11:01 am by Jon Sands
The district court acknowledged it had the authority to depart, but declined to do so, and sentenced the defendant to 188 months. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 7:09 am by Thomas Fisher
Fisher is Solicitor General of the state of Indiana, which co-authored an amicus brief on behalf of the respondent in June Medical Services v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
CLS Bank, many courts have struck down software patents as too-abstract [Timothy Lee, Vox] Iqbal-Twombly principles as remedy for patent trollery? [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 10:29 am by Girardeau Spann
After having de­clined in Fisher v. [read post]