Search for: "Hale v. Hale" Results 161 - 180 of 1,332
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2012, 2:15 am by Laura Sandwell
Starting on Monday 13 February 2012 is the two day appeal of R (on the application of ST (Eritrea)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department in front of a panel of seven (L Hale, L Hope, L Brown, L Mance, L Kerr, L Clarke and L Dyson). [read post]
In the case of Pham (formerly “B2”), Lord Neuberger PSC, Lady Hale DPSC and Lord Mance, Lord Wilson, Lord Sumption, Lord Reed and Lord Carnwath JJSC unanimously dismissed the suspected terrorist’s appeal. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 12:18 pm by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
On 27 July, amidst the traditional flurry of judgments handed down at the end of the Trinity term, a 7 strong Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Hope, Walker, Hale, Mance, Collins and Clarke) gave its ruling in the Belmont Park case, concerning the applicability of the principle of the common law on insolvency known as the ”anti-deprivation rule”. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 11:31 pm by Blog Editorial
  First, on Monday 4 and Tuesday 5 April 2011, Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, Lords Brown, Kerr and Dyson will hear R (McDonald) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:51 am
Lord Walker and Lady Hale gave the lead judgment. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:21 pm by Eric E. Johnson
New Jersey Supreme Court Opinion: Too Much Media, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 2:51 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lady Hale and Lord Wilson had some misgivings about the judge’s judgment. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 7:01 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: Dollar General Corp v MI Band of Choctaw Indians_HALE An excerpt: The State has joined in support of the Petitioner despite the fact that the State of Mississippi has made the policy decision that on-reservation torts arising in Mississippi should not consume State resources and are better addressed by tribal institutions. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 10:37 am
Not for the first time, Nearly Legal has drawn my attention to the case of Holmes-Moorhouse v LB Richmond upon Thames, this time as it reaches the House of Lords. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:07 am by ELEANOR MITCHELL
According to Lady Hale, failing to exempt A from the “bedroom tax” was discriminatory “in the sense described in Thlimmenos v Greece: treating her like any other single parent with one child when in fact she ought to be treated differently” (at [75]). [read post]