Search for: "Hunter v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 585
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2018, 4:43 pm
(Note that voting restrictions may also be unconstitutional if they are motivated by a desire to discriminate based on race, see Hunter v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 3:02 pm
However, as the Supreme Court recognized in the famous 1946 case of United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 6:12 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
8 May 2010, 10:39 am
Gill et al. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 7:19 am
Hunter’s Lessee (14 U.S. 304) and United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 4:51 am
Supreme Court’s decisions in Washington v Seattle Sch Dist No 1 (1982) and Hunter v Erickson (1969), the appeals court found that Proposal 2 unconstitutionally altered Michigan’s political structure by impermissibly burdening racial minorities. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 6:13 pm
Nan Hunter - cross posted at hunter of justice [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 9:30 pm
In seeking guidance, they looked more to theory and practice in other parts of the British Empire where more pluralistic legal systems existed, such as in India, North America and the early United States. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 4:09 am
On 2 April, a nursing entry stated ‘Nil further chest pain’. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 10:32 am
Case Name: Kurtenbach v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 9:30 pm
She ultimately used her private feelings of being "in-between" to publicly contend that identities are not fixed, an idea that has powered campaigns for equal rights in the United States for the past half-century. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 10:24 pm
" United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 11:42 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 2:43 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 4:52 am
United States (Class Action Settlement Agreement)Peggy Fontenot v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 2:35 pm
Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday of this week in Schuette v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 12:08 pm
” Findley’s belief that the second sentence made state-owned submerged lands “not a portion of the park,” prompted Alito to remark that “whether something can be within a unit but not be a portion of the unit is kind of a nice question. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 7:55 am
While that decision may well be challenged before the California Supreme Court, it only underscores how California employees have an avenue to try to avoid the impact of United States Supreme Court decisions regarding class actions – PAGA claims. [read post]
