Search for: "In Re Federal Coal Company" Results 161 - 180 of 416
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2016, 4:08 am by SHG
Aside from NPR not agreeing with the opposition, which includes but goes far beyond “coal companies,” Judge Griffith gave an example, not a standard. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
– Department of Justice News Release, July 22, 2010 Champion Chemical Company, Imperial Oil Company Inc. and Imperial’s two former officers have agreed to pay at least $1.4 million to resolve actions to enforce a prior agreement to reimburse cleanup costs incurred by the federal government at the Imperial Oil Company Inc. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 9:03 pm by Katelynn Catalano
The North American Coal Corporation, one of the parties bringing suit against EPA, urged the Court to resolve whether the U.S. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 9:08 pm by Bryne Hines
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In a forthcoming article in The University of Chicago Business Law Review, Jill E. [read post]
27 May 2014, 8:37 am by WIMS
(Nally), for filling streams at two coal mining sites in Kentucky. . . [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:00 am by David Bernstein
The Court also upheld laws forbidding the employment of children below the age of sixteen in certain hazardous occupations; regulating the hours of labor of women and of men in industrial occupations when overtime work was permitted; regulating the width of entries to coal mines; requiring coal mines to maintain wash houses for their employees at the request of twenty or more workers; making mining companies liable for their willful failure to furnish a reasonably safe… [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 7:28 am by Steven M. Taber
This company’s disregard for state and federal law in its business practices has led to a penalty that reflects the seriousness of the violations,” said Jared [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am by Steven M. Taber
As a result of these enforcement actions, all nine companies returned to compliance with federal law and paid fines ranging from $2,000 to $48,500. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) repealed the Obama Administration’s Clean Power Plan (CPP) and replaced it with the Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) rule, which establishes federal guidelines for carbon dioxide emissions reductions at U.S. coal-fired power plants. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
The agreement, filed in federal court in Kansas, resolves violations of the Clean Air Act’s New Source Review requirements at the company’s Jeffrey Energy Center, a coal-fired power plant near St. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
She also noted that cloud-computing companies are better at complying with data security practices than are other firms. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 8:27 am by WIMS
About three-fourths of those power sector emissions occurred from burning coal. . . [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
The problem was self-reported by the company, and a proposed consent decree was signed by company officials last December and by a U.S. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm by Justin S. Daniel
In repealing the regulation, President Trump asserted that the “rule made it too easy for trial lawyers to get rich by going after American companies and American workers who contract with the federal government. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
In response to a lawsuit from Murray Energy, the largest coal mining company in America, a judge for the U.S. [read post]