Search for: "In re First Judicial Cir." Results 161 - 180 of 1,569
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2011, 5:17 am by Will Aitchison
Slater and Martinson do not deny that each of the first three judicial estoppel factors are satisfied. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
Microsoft Corp., 162 F.3d 708 (1st Cir. 1998), the case on which BC relies for its assertion that the court must undertake a balancing of interests, is inapposite because under the MLAT, discretion whether to grant or deny a request for judicial assistance rests with the Attorney General, not the court. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 6:32 pm
 The first indictment - two superceding indictments notwithstanding - was still live.Hickey is an example of pro-law-and-order judicial activism. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 9:31 pm
See also In re Bath & Kitchen Fixtures Antitrust Litig., 535 F.3d 161, 165 (3d Cir. 2008) (“[A] filing under [FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(i)] is a notice, not a motion. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 3:57 pm by Cicely Wilson
Remanded.In re:  Miller, US 3rd Cir. (9/16/13)Bankruptcy, Legal EthicsThe Millers retained Ettinger in 2008 to represent them in a landlord/tenant dispute. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 5:15 pm by Josh Blackman
But Judge Sutton's representation still result in important questions unaddressed by the memo—if a particular judicial district does adopt this policy, could it be potentially retroactive and result in the re-assignment of currently-pending cases? [read post]
The Eighth Circuit found that the dicta In re Abbott Laboratories, Inc., 698 F.3d  568 (7th Cir. 2012) applied to this case. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 6:04 am
’” In Re Washington Post, 807 F.2d 383, 391 (4th Cir. 1986) (quoting Knight Publishing Co., 743 F.2d at 234). [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:10 pm
  Not exactly something you're going to say on a first date. [read post]