Search for: "Jeffery v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 204
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2016, 11:10 am
See Jefferies v. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 11:10 am
See Jefferies v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 12:47 am
Louis Charalambous discusses the issue on the Inforrm’s Blog in light of the Christopher Jefferies contempt of court case. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 4:12 am
The second question was subject to the CJEU referral in the Nokia v Daimler (see previous posts here), but which has so far remained unanswered in Europe. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 9:01 pm
(See Hurley v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:23 am
– which concerns a State-sponsored dictionary and book that contained derogatory stereotypes of Roma. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 9:55 am
In a 1992 Supreme Court decision, Dawson v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am
Jeffery-Poulter, p. 148 – 150. [4] Dudgeon v the United Kingdom App no 7525/76 (ECtHR, 22 October 1981). [5] United Nations’ Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. [6] CEDAW/C/OP.8/GBR/1 2018 – paras. 83 – 85. [7] [2018] UKSC 27. [8] The Abortion Act 1967: a biography of a UK law, S. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am
Jeffery-Poulter, p. 148 – 150. [4] Dudgeon v the United Kingdom App no 7525/76 (ECtHR, 22 October 1981). [5] United Nations’ Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. [6] CEDAW/C/OP.8/GBR/1 2018 – paras. 83 – 85. [7] [2018] UKSC 27. [8] The Abortion Act 1967: a biography of a UK law, S. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 5:02 am
” Jeffery McPherson, Brian E. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 12:35 pm
The military commission in United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 2:00 am
There’s evidence of the value Jamie’s work in the recent North Carolina Supreme Court case State v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
” (United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 4:39 pm
In Weisleder v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 5:01 am
" Here's the North Carolina Court of Appeals court's analysis, from State v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 11:03 am
Dee V Benson, US Dist. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
Similarly, the European Court of Human Rights has previously refused to accept the UK government’s claim that journalists should receive a higher level of protection under Article 10 (freedom of expression) than non-journalists (Steel and Morris v UK [2005] EMLR 15, [89]). does not mean that popular reactions to criminal activity should receive absolute protection from state interference. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm
There are no adjudicated PCC complaints to report but resolved complaints include: Sally Low v The Independent, Clause 1, 27/01/2012; Mr Syed Ahmad v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; Mr Colin Philip v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; David Bret v The Sun, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; Mr Damien Collis v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 26/01/2012, Mr Peter Reynolds v Lancashire Telegraph, Clause 1, 26/01/2012 Karen Birch v Oldham Evening… [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:20 am
Karlin v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm
The group’s e-petition calls on the Ministry of Justice to “leave FoI alone”, stating, “the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOI) has exposed the scandal of MPs’ expenses, and many examples of waste and improper behaviour by public authorities, politicians and public officials. [read post]
