Search for: "Kelly v. United States" Results 161 - 180 of 978
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In contrast, in Atkinson v Kelly[8]the decision reports that then serving appointing authority "authorized" Atkinson's supervisor to resolve a disciplinary issue by obtaining  a letter of resignation from Atkinson. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In contrast, in Atkinson v Kelly[8]the decision reports that then serving appointing authority "authorized" Atkinson's supervisor to resolve a disciplinary issue by obtaining  a letter of resignation from Atkinson. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In contrast, in Atkinson v Kelly[8]the decision reports that then serving appointing authority "authorized" Atkinson's supervisor to resolve a disciplinary issue by obtaining  a letter of resignation from Atkinson. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Finally, sometimes just the risk of suspension may pressure politicians and other speakers to avoid taking positions a company dislikes, as Justice Stevens warned about in Citizens United.[74] To be sure, being banned by Twitter and Facebook might in some situations be good publicity, especially if one is trying to make a name for oneself: It's still rare enough to be a news story. [read post]
25 May 2021, 2:55 am by Colby Pastre
GILTI is meant to ensure that, regardless of where a U.S. company does business in the world, its foreign subsidiaries pay at least a minimum rate of income tax, if not to other countries, then to the United States. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 8:00 am by Unknown
United States (FTCA; Tribal Police)Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 3:52 pm by Ryan Mulvey
Supreme Court decided United States Fish and Wildlife Service et al. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 12:29 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
See Univ. of Fla., 916 F.3d at 1367; Kelly v. [read post]
§ 1447(d) generally provides that “an order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed is not reviewable on appeal,” the United States Supreme Court explained in Thermtron Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
§ 1447(d) generally provides that “an order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed is not reviewable on appeal,” the United States Supreme Court explained in Thermtron Prods., Inc. v. [read post]