Search for: "King v. HARRIS" Results 161 - 180 of 331
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2022, 12:54 am by Frank Cranmer
The Coronation The Constitution Unit at UCL has published revised versions of two of its reports: The Coronation of Charles III and Swearing in the new King. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 12:05 am by INFORRM
He ordered Harry to make an interim payment of £60,000 in legal costs to News Group Newspapers after ruling largely in favour of the publisher’s bid for a wider search for evidence. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 9:04 am by Amy Howe
”  And at ACSblog, Catherine Fisk weighs in on last month’s decision in Harris v. [read post]
22 May 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Newspapers Journalism and Regulation The Daily Star has been censured by IPSO after it published untrue rumours of a romance between Pippa Middleton and Prince Harry. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm by INFORRM
Privacy battle royal: The Sun was the only national newspaper to print blurry photographs of Prince Harry in a hotel room in Las Vegas, proclaiming its right to freedom of expression and a public interest in publication. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:08 am
Posted by Cydney Posner, Cooley LLP, on Friday, October 12, 2018 Tags: Boards of Directors, Director nominations, Proxy contests, Proxy voting, SEC, Securities regulation, Shareholder voting, Universal proxy ballots SEC Sanctions Investment Firm for Inadequate Cybersecurity and Identity Theft Prevention Policies Posted by Sabastian V. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 5:30 am by Kevin
APRIL Apr. 1: Texas sources report that Harris County Judge Bill McLeod has accidentally resigned from office. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 7:52 am
There's an enchanting little piece about burned DVDs being given away with every purchase of a $5 jewel case here on the 1709 Blog. and if that's not exciting enough, the same blog comes with news of the obituary of Willie the Wizard v Harry Potter and a guest post on the cause celebre in the making, the prosecution of Aaron Swartz. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:45 am by Marvin Ammori
The Montana decision goes into great detail about how out of state corporations and "copper kings" would buy and sell the government through expenditures. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 11:30 pm by Old Fox
Folks out in the free enterprise world cannot do that — thank God.But just as we saw the shares of three healthcare companies skyrocket after the recent SCOTUS decision in King v Burwell — government should not be able to mandate to individual citizens that they MUST purchase a private sector commodity — inconsistent with the Commerce Clause — but very beneficial to the business that the government has chosen to coddle. [read post]