Search for: "Law v. United States" Results 161 - 180 of 68,780
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Jarkesy Supreme Court DecisionThe Supreme Court held that the Seventh Amendment of the United States Constitution entitled Defendants to a jury trial where the SEC sought civil penalties for securities fraud. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Alexander Tsesis is D’Alemberte Chair in Constitutional Law and Professor of Law at the Florida State University College of Law. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Green, Moral Reality as a Guide to Original Meaning: In Defense of United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
He also has a very favorable and motivated judge in United States District Judge Tanya Chutkan. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 12:05 am by INFORRM
United States Influencer Logan Paul has filed a defamation lawsuit against Stephen Findeisen, better known as “Coffeezilla” on YouTube, over videos he produced about Paul’s failed CryptoZoo non-fungible token (NFT) project in 2022. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 10:30 pm by Henry Barrett
Many point to the European Union as a bastion for ‘third way’ media co-regulation—balancing China’s authoritarian grip on expression and the United States’ unrestricted accommodations for free speech. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 10:00 pm
United States clarified that the primary federal law regulating state and local corruption, 18 USC § 666, does not bar state and local officials from accepting “gratuities”—gifts provided without a quid pro quo. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 10:00 pm
United States clarified that the primary federal law regulating state and local corruption, 18 USC § 666, does not bar state and local officials from accepting “gratuities”—gifts provided without a quid pro quo. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 10:00 pm
United States clarified that the primary federal law regulating state and local corruption, 18 USC § 666, does not bar state and local officials from accepting “gratuities”—gifts provided without a quid pro quo. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 10:00 pm
United States clarified that the primary federal law regulating state and local corruption, 18 USC § 666, does not bar state and local officials from accepting “gratuities”—gifts provided without a quid pro quo. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 10:00 pm
United States clarified that the primary federal law regulating state and local corruption, 18 USC § 666, does not bar state and local officials from accepting “gratuities”—gifts provided without a quid pro quo. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 10:00 pm
United States clarified that the primary federal law regulating state and local corruption, 18 USC § 666, does not bar state and local officials from accepting “gratuities”—gifts provided without a quid pro quo. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 4:30 pm by Craig R. Tractenberg
On appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court’s judgment in all respects. [read post]