Search for: "Law v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 61,494
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2025, 9:01 pm
United States litigation challenging the Executive Order. [read post]
6 Apr 2025, 7:56 am
” Castillo v. [read post]
6 Apr 2025, 5:01 am
The letter responded to the university's attempt to talk by outlining some, but possibly not all, of the changes the university would have to make in order to preserve the university's "continued financial relationship with the United States government. [read post]
5 Apr 2025, 6:25 pm
The only court that can set aside these rulings is the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Apr 2025, 6:31 am
’s country of residence, which, regardless of who had “custody,” is a protected custodial right under the Hague Convention that Dürüst breached by moving O.T. to the United States without his approval. [read post]
5 Apr 2025, 6:28 am
Papakosmas v. [read post]
5 Apr 2025, 3:16 am
The Court had ordered the platform to remove the account of a blogger who fled to the United States while under investigation for crimes including criminal organization, slander, defamation, insult, and racism. [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 4:11 pm
Instead, the Tucker Act grants the Court of Federal Claims jurisdiction over suits based on "any express or implied contract with the United States. [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 12:01 pm
United States.... [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 9:50 am
Here, President Trump declared an emergency relating to China because of illegal opioids entering the United States. [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 9:43 am
In particular, the Executive Orders direct government contracts and grant agreements to include: A term requiring the contractual counterparty or grant recipient to agree that its compliance in all respects with all applicable Federal anti-discrimination laws is material to the government’s payment decisions for purposes of section 3729(b)(4) of tile 31, United States Code [the FCA]; and A term requiring such counterparty or recipient to certify that it does… [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 8:55 am
United States unsettles this balance. [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 7:25 am
§ 1052. [3] Gilson LaLonde, Far from Fluent, supra note 1 at 789. [4] Palm Bay Imps., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 7:00 am
Consent in Dred Scott Written by a slaveholder and joined by five other slaveholders, Dred Scott v. [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 6:24 am
The issue is not limited to legal issues in the United States, and we welcome articles from the different perspectives of rightsholders, online platforms, sellers, and others. [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 6:10 am
Bryce Martinez v. [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 4:58 am
Evidence recognized under the law. must be in admissible form and properly authenticated (Doe v. [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 3:00 am
The “no set of circumstances” test originated in a 1987 case, United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 12:21 am
The American Context In the United States, courts grant anti-suit injunctions more freely, though still under strict criteria. [read post]
3 Apr 2025, 9:05 pm
United States, a 1935 case upholding for-cause removal protections for independent agencies, and Seila Law v. [read post]
