Search for: "Leone v. Leone" Results 161 - 180 of 1,682
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2022, 4:18 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Therefore, at this stage, dismissal was not warranted under CPLR 3211(a)(7), or under CPLR 3211(a)(1), as defendant failed to provide documentary evidence that “conclusively establishes a defense to the asserted claims as a matter of law” (Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 88 [1994]; Amsterdam Hospitality Group, LLC v Marshall-Alan Assoc., Inc., 120 AD3d 431, 432-433 [1st Dept 2014])” [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 4:38 am by Peter J. Sluka
YMSF In the first case, YMSF Family Partnership v Beitel, Index No. 514791/2017, Brooklyn Commercial Division Justice Leon Ruchelsman granted summary judgment on the plaintiff’s claim for a declaratory judgment seeking to recognize his 49.9% membership interest in 5309 18th Ave Besatya LLC (“Besatya”), a limited liability company that owns real property in Brooklyn. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
Civil Rights”—Motley litigated hundreds of cases that remade American law and society, including Brown v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:29 am by Peter Mahler
In another First Department decision earlier this month, the court in Newman v Newman affirmed a decision by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Barry R. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 4:14 am by José Guillermo
, ya me lo han dicho -una mujer- y en otro escenario de debate, les explico, volvamos al ejemplo de Paulina que le dice mantenido a su cónyuge con tanta insistencia que el ofendido se dirige hacia su esposa y le encaja un "cachetadón" y la ofensora, por la fuerza del impacto cae al suelo y su rostro conforme pasen las horas se hinchará, pregunto, ¿Es un agresor de mujeres el esposo de la víctima por su arranque de furia? [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 5:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “The complaint, as augmented by the affidavit of Singh submitted in opposition to the defendants’ motion to dismiss, sufficiently stated a cause of action for legal malpractice (see CPLR 3211[a][7]; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88; Doe v Ascend Charter Schs., 181 AD3d 648, 649-650). [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 4:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Accepting plaintiff’s averments and allegations as true (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]; Berry v Ambulance Serv. of Fulton County, Inc., 39 AD3d 1123, 1124 [2007]) and inasmuch as the documentary evidence submitted by defendant does not conclusively refute them (see New York State Workers’ Compensation Bd. v Program Risk Mgt., Inc., 150 AD3d 1589, 1594 [2017]), Supreme Court correctly denied that part of the motion seeking dismissal… [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 3:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Viewing the complaint in the light most favorable to the plaintiff (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d at 87-88), it failed to plead specific factual [*2]allegations as to proximate cause. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 9:23 am by Gene Takagi
Notable Events of the Week: “President Biden warned President Vladimir V. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 11:24 am by Public Employment Law Press
This is especially true in CPLR article 78 proceedings (Matter of Leone v Blum, 73 A.D.2d 252, 274, mot for lv to app granted 50 N.Y.2d 1042). [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 11:24 am by Public Employment Law Press
This is especially true in CPLR article 78 proceedings (Matter of Leone v Blum, 73 A.D.2d 252, 274, mot for lv to app granted 50 N.Y.2d 1042). [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 3:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
On a motion to dismiss a cause of action pursuant to CPLR 3211(a), the court must accept the facts as alleged in the complaint as true, accord the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory (see CPLR 3026; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88). [read post]