Search for: "Liu v. State" Results 161 - 180 of 513
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2013, 9:29 am by Lindsay Griffiths
    New York Court Finds that Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Anti-Retaliation Provision Does Not Apply Extraterritorially from Epstein Becker & Green: John Fullerton III looks at  Meng-Lin Liu v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 5:01 am
’ In December 2009, Nobrega had an employee named Wei Liu. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 3:34 pm by Jeanne Huang
The first case is Liu v Ma.[1] The plaintiff sought to recognize and enforce a default Chinese judgment (worth RMB 3,900,000) against the defendants. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 7:03 am by Joy Waltemath
The anti-retaliation provision of the Dodd-Frank Act does not extend beyond U.S. soil, a federal district court in New York ruled, dismissing the retaliation claims of a China-based compliance officer for a German corporation’s Chinese subsidiary (Liu v Siemens, A.G., October 21, 2013, Pauley, W, III). [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 3:25 pm
"So she's reluctant, but in the end, what Justice Werdegar and Chief Justice Cantil-Sakayue say seems right to her.At this point, anyway.Then there's Justice Liu. [read post]
20 May 2020, 4:27 am by Jeanne Huang
This is demonstrated by a reply issued by the Chinese Supreme People’s Court in 2006, which provides that judgments issued in Australia cannot be recognized and enforced in China because Australia has not offered reciprocity to Chinese judgments.[1] Liu v Ma & anor [2017] VSC 810 is the first Chinese monetary judgment recognized and enforced in the state of Victoria. [read post]
21 May 2021, 2:39 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Thus, they cannot serve “to circumvent the shorter statute of limitations for legal malpractice” (Hsu v Liu & Shields LLP, 127 AD3d 522, 523 [1st Dept 2015], lv dismissed in part, denied in part 26 NY3d 996 [2015]). [read post]