Search for: "Mapp v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 187
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2007, 12:54 am
Feb 06, 2007) (NO. 9941, 9941A, 730/05)The People appeal from orders of the Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Allen, J.), entered (1) on or about August 4, 2005, which, after a Mapp hearing, granted defendant's motion for suppression, and (2) on or about September 9, 2005, which ...
12.
-- A The People of the State of New York, Respondent, 7454/02 v. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 12:50 pm
” Forty-seven years later in Mapp v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:45 am
s, after Mapp v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 6:13 pm
See Brown v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 8:45 am
He targets United States v. [read post]
When Police Conduct a Post Arrest Search Without an Arrest: Challenging Illegal Searches in New York
20 Jan 2012, 2:57 am
Ultimately, if you are searched in a legal manner or during their investigation you state that you have a gun, the case addressed here may not help your cause, but your attorney should still seek to challenge the police and preserve your rights through a Huntley or Mapp Hearing. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
Arizona (1966) and lesser known but even more important cases like Mapp v. [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 7:49 pm
(as he then was) stated in Collins v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 9:25 am
See Mapp v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
United States), for federal agents, and to 1961 (Mapp v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 7:20 am
United States (1998, in which Justice Breyer wrote for the majority) that first advanced the constitutional theory adopted by the Court in Apprendi v. [read post]
8 Mar 2014, 6:13 am
Canonical cases like Mapp v. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 7:23 am
How Cardozo ridiculed it, and how the Supremes may get their chance to play with Mapp v. [read post]
6 Nov 2024, 7:00 am
Supreme Court in the 1961 case Mapp v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 8:27 am
In fact, in his motion, Padilla relies heavily on United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
Co. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 10:53 am
Of particular note, he expressed misgivings in Henry, and then again in 2008 (United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 7:10 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 11:47 pm
Immediately after the decision, Mapp v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
One study back in the 60’s showed that in the years after Mapp v. [read post]