Search for: "Marks v. DISTRICT COURT, ETC." Results 161 - 180 of 410
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2010, 6:26 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
It was legal for the district court to prohibit Green from associating with street gangs. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 12:38 pm
 Despite the fact that the jury found that the Los Angeles Unified School District wasn't liable at all, maybe that finding was influenced by some rulings that aren't kosher. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 4:00 am by Tim Sitzmann
(the application is for a standard character mark and not limited to any particular trade dress) All of these factors would have been considered by a district court in an infringement analysis. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
(EPLAW) District Court of The Hague: Ex parte order based on misleading information: Franz Grimme Landmaschinenfabrik GmbH & Co, KG v. [read post]
6 Jan 2013, 10:37 am by Sai Vinod
The US District Court for the Nothern District of California in [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Thomas says strict scrutiny even if it’s commercial; etc. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 5:51 am by Geri Haight
” That is the essence of the question before the Federal District Court in Arizona in a Complaint filed on May 21, 2012 by David Elliott against Internet search engine giant Google, Inc. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 6:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Grimaldi grounds, the district court’s grant of summary judgment to MTV on the resulting trademark claims. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm by Florian Mueller
Some companies just want to ensure the Supreme Court won't weaken design patents too much, but they don't say the law of the smartphone should follow from the law of the spoon. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) District Court N D Illinois: False marking false marking false marking all at up to $500 per offense: Simonian v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Realtime Data, LLC d/b/a IXO (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) District Court N D Illinois: False marking false marking false marking all at up to $500 per offense: Simonian v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 8:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” The district court found that the email used Tri-Serve’s mark in a non-trademark way, as a source of comparison between the two organizations. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(IP Litigation Blog) New Jersey local patent rules (IP Frontline)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC applies KSR – finding combination claims obvious: Ball Aerosol v Limited Brands, Bath & Body Works etc (Patently-O) (IP Law Observer) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) (Law360) CAFC rejects lower court’s ob [read post]