Search for: "Martin v. Davis" Results 161 - 180 of 433
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2013, 9:38 pm by Buce
 Or when we compare Martin Luther King, Jr., to, um …. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 4:03 am by Robin Shea
Labor practitioners Tim Davis, Jonathan Martin, and Dan Murphy will talk about quickie elections and also about the NLRB’s new ruling on employee use of employer email systems for organizing. [read post]
19 May 2024, 10:13 pm by INFORRM
As mentioned above, on the same day a statement in open court was read out in the case of Davies v BBC–KB-2024-000828. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Parke, Davis & Co., 256 F.3d 1013, 1021 (10th Cir. 2001) (wrong to “construe [a treater’s] ‘heeding’ an adequate warning to mean [s/he] would have given the warning”) (applying Oklahoma law); In re Diet Drug Litigation, 895 A.2d 480, 490-91 (N.J. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 2:49 pm by Giles Peaker
No order as to costs, Our thanks to Martin Davis of 33 Bedford Row and Sean Shanmuganathan of Tyrer Roxborough Solicitors for the details of the decision. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 1:20 pm by Meg Martin
Freudenthal and Mark Stewart of Davis & Cannon, LLP, Cheyenne, Wyoming; Bruce A. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 6:19 am
Sama, and Jennifer Wieboldt, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, on Wednesday, July 11, 2018 Tags: Cross-border transactions, Morrison v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:05 am
Emmerich and Robin Panovka, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Wednesday, January 30, 2019 Tags: Antitrust, CFIUS, Cross-border transactions, Disclosure, Distressed companies, International governance, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, SEC, Securities regulation, Taxation Corporations are People Too (And They Should Act Like It) Posted by Kent Greenfield (Boston College), on Wednesday, January 30, 2019 … [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 3:26 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The aspects of the contingency fee retainer agreement prepared by defendants and signed by plaintiff that allegedly render it noncompliant with 22 NYCRR 1215.1 do not bar defendants from recovering in quantum meruit (see Seth Rubenstein, P.C. v Ganea, 41 AD3d 54, 60-64 [2007]; see also Egnotovich v Katten Muchin Zavis & Roseman LLP, 55 AD3d 462, 464 [2008]; Nicoll & Davis LLP v Ainetchi, 52 AD3d 412 [2008]). [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 2:35 pm by Michael Stevens
Kenneth McKee     Eastern District of Michigan at Flint 08a0760n.06  Martin v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 2:35 pm by Michael Stevens
Kenneth McKee     Eastern District of Michigan at Flint 08a0760n.06  Martin v. [read post]