Search for: "Matter of Will of Smith"
Results 161 - 180
of 10,800
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2024, 8:21 am
These summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to the present. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 2:00 am
FBI Supervisory Special Agent David Smith, who is the transportation program manager within the federal agency’s cyber division, said the “transport sector can be targeted by hacktivists, criminals, insiders, spies, terrorists and countries engaged in warfare. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 1:31 pm
He was joined by Chief Judge Richman and Judges Jones, Smith, Elrod, Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, and Wilson. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:15 am
These summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to the present. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
Smith (Marva) v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
ADJ14258730—WCAB Panel: Commissioners Capurro, Snellings, Chair Zalewski Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board Panel Decision) Opinion Filed October 13, 2023 Injury AOE/COE—Substantial Medical Evidence—COVID-19—WCAB, granting reconsideration, rescinded decision in which WCJ found that decedent sustained injury in form of COVID-19 while employed by defendant as buyer on 12/4/2020, resulting in his death on 1/8/2021, and returned matter to WCJ for… [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 5:12 am
Pending Supreme Court Case Complicates Special Counsel Smith’s Choices by Andrew Weissmann and Ryan Goodman 13. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm
July 19, 2007) (concluding that the "defendants' description of [the plaintiff] as a racist" was, as a matter of law, "an opinion and thus is not actionable"); Smith v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 11:00 am
While the readers may remember that in InterDigital v Lenovo [2023] EWHC 539 (Pat) Mellor J adopted an exclusionary approach with comparables, disregarding most and eventually relied on a single prior licence LG 2017 to derive all the rates in that Judgment, Marcus Smith J differed from that approach and considered that at least in this case, the comparables only have value if an inclusive approach is taken. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
So far, just one judge has ruled on this matter. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 3:49 pm
The SB 8 Defendants have not moved to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:59 am
The fact of the matter is that everything Jack Smith has done as Special Counsel, since his appointment on November 18, 2022 has been unconstitutional and is null and void. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:19 am
SEC, December 19, 2023, Smith, J.).Default rule is vacatur. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 5:18 am
TRUMP-RELATED LEGAL MATTERS Colorado’s Republican Party said that it will switch from a primary to caucus system in the upcoming presidential nominating process if the state’s Supreme Court ruling holding that Trump may not appear on the ballot stands. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm
Smith to be a Special Counsel with the power of one of the 93 U.S. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 6:32 am
The SRA kindly posted videos and resources from its recent event: “Compliance Officers Virtual Conference 2023” — VIDEO: “Anti-money laundering – what your firm needs to know“ Anti-money laundering guidance Client and matter risk template Client and matter risk assessments (Many more videos and resources worth a look, via the top link) Travelers Insurance shares: “UK: What’s Behind Large Losses in Law Firms? [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 4:35 am
The matter is now before both the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia and the Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 3:42 pm
The resolution authorizing the inquiry specifies no subject matter beyond saying that it can include matters described in a Sept. 27, 2023 memo by Committee Chairs James Comer (R-KY), Jim Jordan (R-OH), and Jason Smith (R-MO). [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
In Matter of Smith v City of Norwich, 205 AD3d 140 the Appellate Division held that in the event an administrative determination is made where an evidentiary hearing is not required by law, court review is limited to whether the administrative determination had a rational basis and was not arbitrary and capricious. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
In Matter of Smith v City of Norwich, 205 AD3d 140 the Appellate Division held that in the event an administrative determination is made where an evidentiary hearing is not required by law, court review is limited to whether the administrative determination had a rational basis and was not arbitrary and capricious. [read post]
