Search for: "Matter of Determination of Conflicting Rights"
Results 161 - 180
of 6,093
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
The court explained that "The scope of judicial review under the Human Rights Law is extremely narrow and is confined to the consideration of whether the determination of the SDHR is supported by substantial evidence** in the record," citing Matter of New York State Div. of Human Rights v Roadtec, Inc., 167 AD3d 898. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 2:46 pm
The Supreme Court did not even review procedural matters on the rare occasions when it had jurisdiction to review certain military commissions, limiting its review only to matters of temporal (to determine whether convened during an armed conflict or occupation), personal and subject matter jurisdiction (see e.g. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 1:05 am
Under these facts, we conclude that Condition C and Endorsement 10 conflict at best, when read together create an ambiguity. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 12:00 am
But discerning the precise boundaries of the CWA has led to conflicts between private property rights and the reach of the federal government. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 12:00 am
But discerning the precise boundaries of the CWA has led to conflicts between private property rights and the reach of the federal government. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am
"A mere conflict in opinion among physicians is not a ground for disturbing a determination" (Matter of Bradley v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 193 AD3d at 848 [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am
"A mere conflict in opinion among physicians is not a ground for disturbing a determination" (Matter of Bradley v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 193 AD3d at 848 [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 9:25 am
Avoid family conflict. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 6:21 pm
Utah Parent Time (Visitation) Guidelines Securing your rights to time with your children is one of the most important aspects of a divorce or family legal matter. [read post]
11 Nov 2024, 6:47 am
” “However, the special master later determined that DLA Piper’s representation of Harbour against TeneoBio in the current litigation appears likely conflictual, although she found that the conflict was ‘thrust upon’ DLA Piper because the conflict didn’t exist at the time DLA Piper agreed to represent Harbour in the litigation. [read post]
21 May 2024, 6:51 am
‘This determination was not based on any coercion or threats by anyone, including Tesla.'” “Holland & Knight represents Tesla in unrelated employment matters, including a race discrimination suit by a California civil rights agency and a separate race discrimination case by the U.S. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 3:26 pm
But on reflection, I'm not sure that's right. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 8:22 am
This could include matters such as property division, child custody and support, alimony, and other financial considerations. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 7:34 am
First, the court determines whether the work implicated by the state-created right falls within the subject matter of copyright as a work of authorship. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 2:18 pm
No matter how carefully the Right to be Forgotten might be defined, conflicting principles of due process and free expression, inevitably render it a thorny and contested task. [read post]
3 May 2020, 6:30 am
They contended that the federal courts enjoyed unique authority to determine the Constitution’s meaning and exploited that perceived authority in an attempt to constitutionalize traditional common law rights to contract and property. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 1:16 pm
Likewise, once a conflict of interest is determined to exist, the appropriate remedy is disqualification of the attorney, except in the interests of justice. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 9:51 am
., A-1470-09T2, November 24, 2010: Scheduling parenting time based upon a determination of children’s best interests is a matter of sound judicial discretion. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
It then reversed the Appellate Division's order and remitted the matter it "for consideration of issues raised but not determined on the appeal. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
It then reversed the Appellate Division's order and remitted the matter it "for consideration of issues raised but not determined on the appeal. [read post]
