Search for: "Matter of Marriage of Edwards"
Results 161 - 180
of 203
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2022, 11:55 pm
Therefore, the proceedings in the ET were a nullity (the ET following the High Court decision in HM Attorney General v Edwards [2015] EWHC 1653 Admin). [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 7:48 pm
On abortion and gay marriage, Canadian courts have tended to move in lockstep with public opinion. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 4:52 am
Edward-Isaac Dovere reports for CNN. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
LoveandGarbage veers between the sane and surreal – writing in depth about serious issues and then going off piste on the SNOW, one of his favourite topics in recent weeks… How politics works: Weather hysteria And then LoveandGarbage was able to report from The Cabinet Rooms at Cowley Street… Cable speaks to the nation: Declaration of war on Rupert Murdoch SCOTS LAW NEWS is a very good starting point to be kept abreast of law issues and topical… [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 4:20 pm
Certainly there is no rosy past where there was a perfect separation of church and state, where religious views were considered to be private matters not suitable fodder for public consumption. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
Edwards (2003) 111 Cal.App.4th 436, 444, 4 Cal.Rptr.3d 54; Schild v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 9:56 pm
Sometimes, for example as in the case of the Court of Appeal, the different judicial divisions may reach different opinions on subjects ranging from marriage to child custody, service of processes, and enforcement of awards and judgments. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:52 am
Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd (2012); Acts of Resistance in Asylum Seekers’ Persecution Narratives, 40-54, in Immigrant Rights in the Shadows of United States Citizenship. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
As with all matters of judicial interpretation, there are matters of nuance and construction. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 8:42 am
Bork and Attorney General Edward Levi filed two briefs in Buckley, on opposite sides of the First Amendment questions raised in that case. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
And there is the matter that the anonymous critic was offering a criticism that was also not peer reviewed. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
We note below where further information would be helpful before reaching any firm conclusion on a matter. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
Edward Kennedy, it was foolish to ever think that voters could, on the one hand, vote for legislative and executive candidates based on party affiliation, policy stances, and things like affability, and then switch to the judicial races and vote solely based on the candidate’s qualifications with respect to impartially and independently interpreting the law. [read post]
30 May 2014, 6:31 am
North Carolina, 13-633; Edwards v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
Edward J. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:17 pm
The Michaelmas Legal Term ends today and this is the last Law and Media Round Up of 2015. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 4:28 pm
The DLA Piper “Privacy Matters” blog has a post entitled “The Netherlands – DPA imposes €830,000 fine for access requests fees”. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 3:31 pm
The adviser specifically cited abortion and same sex marriage as the two issues the governor had in mind. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 8:23 pm
It still contains 12 specific requirements, all of which must be met, no matter how marginal some may be. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
The case concerned an article published by The Times on 21 November 2022 titled Law chiefs rule against college head in gay row, which falsely claimed that Ms Rose had wrongly claimed she was professionally obliged to take on a same-sex marriage case in the Cayman Islands and had acted recklessly. [read post]
