Search for: "Mendez v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 295
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2007, 12:11 pm
Mendez Lynch, 220 F. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 12:50 pm
In State of California, ex rel, Xavier Becerra v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:25 am
One exception to the general rule applied for the purpose of determining if an individual has attained tenure by estoppel is set out in Mendez v Valenti, 101 AD2d 612. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 12:50 pm
” In State of California, ex rel, Xavier Becerra v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:00 am
Matter of Rijos v New York City Tr. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:00 am
Matter of Rijos v New York City Tr. [read post]
23 May 2023, 8:30 am
Supreme Court’s 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 7:40 am
Harrison v. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 7:42 am
See Mendez v. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 7:10 pm
Rick Wilson, drafter of the EU amicus brief in Roper v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 12:22 am
In Mendez v Valenti, 101 AD2d 612, the Appellate Division held that retaining Mendez on the payroll until the end of payroll period for administrative convenience did not result in his attaining tenure in the position. [read post]
15 May 2017, 1:10 pm
Mendez, No. 16-639, argued March 22. [read post]
11 May 2017, 4:35 am
” At his eponymous blog, Sheldon Nahmod looks at County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 1:04 am
DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Criminal Practice Alien With ICE Detainer Did Not Complete Drug Treatment, Is Not Entitled to Sentence Reduction Mendez v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 3:47 pm
” Mendez v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:30 am
The letter instructed PE “not to report for any further shifts” and stated that his “termination would be effective as of September 23.... [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 4:23 pm
Mendez (C.D. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 3:01 am
Mendez we see that some of the claims are too old, and some are timely. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 1:10 am
United States U.S. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 4:34 am
” At The Employment Law Group, Scott Oswald takes a look at Tuesday’s opinion in State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]