Search for: "Michael Wasserman"
Results 161 - 180
of 215
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2017, 4:40 am
Coverage of the confirmation process ahead comes from Nina Totenberg at NPR; Michael Bobelian at Forbes; Sean Sullivan and others in The Washington Post; and Alexander Bolton at The Hill. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 4:33 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Michael Mannheimer wonders whether Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s opinion concurring in the judgment in part, in which she questioned the court’s unanimous 1996 holding in Whren v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 2:27 pm
Attorney Michael Grady, and former FBI Special Agent David F. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 2:25 pm
Attorney Michael Grady, and former FBI Special Agent David F. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 3:19 am
Michael Schmidt, an employment attorney in New York City, has seen an uptick in recent months in private employers calling him to find out if they can bring in unpaid interns as a way to cut costs. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:20 am
” Additional commentary comes from Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 3:39 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman wrote a sentence that was astounding.* As professors, our focus is not on what we discuss in class but how we discuss it. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 3:43 am
Other comments on the argument in Hernández come in two posts at Prawsfblawg from Howard Wasserman, here and here. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 9:22 am
Michael Stevens at the Kentucky Law Review has all the details...and then...late breaking news, the Hospital asks the court to gag their gag order. [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:15 am
Howard Wasserman has this blog’s opinion analysis. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am
” In an op-ed in the New York Times, Michael McConnell argues that the court’s three recent decisions on religious freedom (Espinoza v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am
Coverage of Windsor comes from Tony Mauro of the National Law Journal, who describes the decision as “a major civil rights turning point,” and Michael Bobelian for Forbes, while commentary comes from Deirdre M. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 5:18 am
” And at Verdict, Michael Dorf suggests that the order “looks very much like an attempt to perform a function that federal district judges routinely play: facilitating settlement. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 4:28 am
” Commentary comes from Michael Mannheimer at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:57 am
Howard Wasserman analyzes the opinion for this blog. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 8:36 am
NASD, SEC and Regulatory Defense Blog Holland & Hart attorney Michael MacPhail writes the content in the NASD, SEC and Regulatory Defense Blog. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 2:08 pm
Florida Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, she represents ports bringing more than 400,000 jobs to Floridians. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 8:57 am
[IA-1] - 7/12/2007 Rep Capuano, Michael E. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:18 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman notes that “[t]he dispute leaves open whether SCOTUS could review decisions by modern administrative agencies (something Congress has never purported to do). [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 11:45 am
[IA-1] - 7/12/2007 Rep Capuano, Michael E. [read post]
