Search for: "Mitchell v. Mitchell"
Results 161 - 180
of 2,755
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2012, 5:20 pm
Janus , Shawn Alexander and Leah Graf (William Mitchell College of Law , affiliation not provided to SSRN and affiliation not provided to SSRN) have posted M. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 9:00 pm
Mitchell H. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 3:12 am
Mitchill v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 6:49 am
This case reminds me of the 1872 Illiniois case of Alcorn v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 9:00 pm
Petit v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 9:01 pm
Mitchell H. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 12:54 pm
Thanks to Ian Mitchell for sending word of Quilloin v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 4:20 am
Tenure v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 9:16 am
The prior CofC Ombuds was V. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 10:17 am
By Mitchell Riese and Mitchel Wilson In Nelson v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 11:44 am
By Mitchell Riese and Mitchel Wilson In DeStefano v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 4:22 pm
By Mitchell Riese and Mitchel Wilson In Maish v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 4:51 pm
By Mitchell Riese and Mitchel Wilson In Vicino v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 11:39 am
By Mitchell Riese and Mitchel Wilson In Felkins v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 2:02 pm
Contract Interpretation California Law (…) See Cundall v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 9:01 pm
Way to make the country less free, guys [Missouri Freedom Watch] More: Stephen Bainbridge, Charles Sullivan on Mitchell v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 7:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 9:50 am
In Affholder, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 11:19 am
"An excerpt is reposted below, and you can read the full article here.Professor Mitchell's characteristically thoughtful and incisive comment makes many important points.1 He is right in saying that Atkins v Virginia2 and Thompson v Oklahoma3 fit the modernization model better than Roper v Simmons4 or Kennedy v Louisiana.5 I also agree with Professor Mitchell that a modernization approach gives political actors an incentive to… [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 3:40 am
United States v. [read post]