Search for: "Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd." Results 161 - 173 of 173
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2012, 2:24 am by Giesela Ruehl
It also refers to the laws enacted on a national level in Germany which are a consequence of the new European instruments. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:59 am by SHG
National Australia Bank, Ltd., 561 U.S. 247, 255 (2010) (internal quotation marks omitted; quoting EEOC v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:04 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s holding in Morrison v, National Australia Bank – which held that the U.S. securities laws do not apply to securities transactions that take place outside the U.S. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
  Usually, this occurs when governments issue surveillance directives requiring production of data held outside their national borders. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 2:57 pm by Cathy Holmes
National Australia Bank Ltd., which limits the SEC’s jurisdiction to bring anti-fraud actions to claims that involve the purchase or sale of securities made in the U.S. or involving a security listed on a domestic exchange. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:43 am
All records or other information regarding the identification of the account, to include full name, physical address, telephone numbers and other identifiers, records of session times and durations, the date on which the account was created, the length of service, the types of service utilized, the IP address used to register the account, log-in IP addresses associated with session times and dates, account status, alternative e-mail addresses provided during registration, methods of connecting, log… [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 9:53 am by William McGrath
These cases and other matters from the last month are discussed in greater detail after the jump.The SEC v. [read post]
Structural Shifts: concomitant widespread elimination of (i) supermajority voting requirements, (ii) staggered or classified board terms, and (iii) stockholder rights plans (often done to avoid or compromise likely stockholder proposals), accompanied by limitations on (iv) change-in-control executive severance agreements, along with (v) increased stockholder rights to call special stockholder meetings, in tandem with (vi) highly publicized proposals advocating multiflavored… [read post]