Search for: "Neil Siegel"
Results 161 - 180
of 213
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2017, 4:53 am
Meanwhile, Curtis Bradley and Neil S. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 10:44 am
Professors Reva Siegel and Neil Siegel have described Griswold as “offer[ing] women the most significant constitutional protection since the Nineteenth Amendment gave women the right to vote, constitutional protection as important as the cases prohibiting sex discrimination that the Court would decide in the next decade – perhaps even more so. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 6:20 am
Neil Siegel, in his 2005 critique of Sunstein's work on minimalism - A Theory in Search of a Court, and itself: Judicial Minimalism at the Supreme Court Bar, available online here - has written that "pre-empirically, it appears more likely that whatever costs the Court saves itself by taking a minimalist path will be outweighed by the costs incurred by litigants, lower courts, and, political bodies". [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 6:43 am
Commentary on the Court’s Commerce Clause reasoning comes from Neil Siegel at Balkinization and Randy Barnett at Reason (video). [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 5:11 pm
Finally, we know that he named three people to act as co-executors for the estate: John Branca, John McClain, and Barry Siegel. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 3:43 am
Also at this blog, Suzanne Goldberg and Neil Siegel weighed in on the denials. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 3:54 am
” At Balkinization, Neil Siegel reacts to the description of the Supreme Court’s ruling upholding the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate in Joan Biskupic’s recent biography of Chief Justice John Roberts. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 3:04 am
Commentary comes from Neil Siegel at The Hill. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:20 pm
As Justice Scalia explained during an appearance at Duke Law School:[Professor Neil] Siegel, a constitutional law scholar and former Supreme Court clerk, asked Scalia to expound on his statement that he was “an originalist, not a nut. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 11:20 am
Brian Galle, Neil Siegel, and my former colleague Max Stearns). [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:53 am
.” At Balkinization, Neil Siegel calls for clear confidentiality rules for clerks. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:27 am
At Balkinization, Neil Siegel implores the justices not to “’just look away’” from the real motivations behind the decision. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:35 am
(Reva Siegel and Neil Siegel point out that the case can—and should—be read more narrowly to exclude only some pregnancy discrimination, but unfortunately, that is not how courts have read it since.)Geduldig’s vision of social reality divided the world not between men and women but—I am not making this up— between “pregnant and non-pregnant persons. [read post]
19 May 2022, 5:56 am
The equality arguments summarized by Professor Reva Siegel and Professor Neil Siegel (and here by just RS) recognize a "bona fide interest in protecting potential life. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 10:04 am
by Neil H. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:20 am
Curtis Bradley and Neil S. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 8:43 am
(2009) · Clay Shirky, Cognitive Surplus: Creativity and Generosity in a Connected Age (2010) · Nick Bilton, I Live in the Future & Here’s How It Works (2010) · Kevin Kelly, What Technology Wants (2010) · Neil [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 9:30 pm
Neil Siegel and I elaborated this argument earlier in the year in the Yale Law Journal Online. 2) Tomorrow the Court will turn to the merits of the challenges to the minimum coverage provision. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
At Verdict, Michael Dorf and Neil Siegel argue that the Anti-Injunction Act does not bar the Court’s review of the individual mandate, but they add that, to resolve any doubt, “Congress should enact a special-purpose statute stating that the Anti-Injunction Act does not bar pre-enforcement challenges to the minimum coverage provision until that provision actually goes into effect. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 4:35 am
” At Balkinization, Neil Siegel summarizes his recent contribution to a Yale Law Journal symposium on Justice Samuel Alito, concluding “that, especially in light of Justice Scalia’s passing, Justice Alito has become the primary judicial voice of the many millions of Americans who appear to be losing the culture wars, including in conflicts over gay rights, women’s access to reproductive healthcare, religious exemptions, and affirmative action. [read post]
