Search for: "Nixon v. Nixon"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,509
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2017, 6:09 am
Nixon of Byrne & Nixon LLP, said at the hearing that Liang was the first person to accept responsibility for what happened and that he had cooperated with prosecutors and agreed to testify against another VW executive, Oliver Schmidt, if Schmidt’s case had gone to trial, according to the observer. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 5:54 am
Copyright (c) 2010 by John V. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 11:27 am
Republican Senators (encouraged quietly by candidate Nixon) together with the Dixiecrats blocked the Fortas nomination in hopes that Nixon would fill the seat with a nominee of his choice. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 4:57 am
Rev. 1506 (2016) Download Article President Nixon’s Indian Law Legacy: A Counterstory Scholars of Federal Indian law have often celebrated President Richard Nixon for advancing tribal interests through legislation and policy initiatives. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 8:12 am
For Nixon, there was that whole messy obstruction of justice thing. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 12:21 pm
Supreme Court case Laird v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 8:02 pm
The common law presumes a right of access to judicial records, see Nixon v. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 7:18 am
So, for example, for Article I we focused on McCullough v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 6:28 am
Kutler’s entry on New York Times Co. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm
” And although the Supreme Court held in Nixon v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 1:48 pm
(See Butz v. [read post]
Second Circuit Holds that Employer May Have Duty to Accommodate Disabled Employee with Daily Commute
14 Nov 2011, 12:38 pm
In Nixon-Tinkelman v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 8:47 pm
Nixon on our hands. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 6:40 am
In his statement to the court in State of Arizona v. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 8:22 pm
Nixon after that. [read post]
6 May 2018, 6:52 am
The potential controversy over the special counsel issuing a grand-jury subpoena for President Trump offers a nice illustration of judicial departmentalism, outside my usual focus of constitutional litigation. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 8:10 am
SCOTUS, Executive Privilege, and United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2019, 7:36 am
And that Constitution does not authorize impeachment for anything short of high crimes and misdemeanors.Here's the case he's talking about Nixon v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 8:35 am
" There is very little case law that guides this issue, but the Second Circuit relies on United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 4:38 pm
That is what happened here.The case is Vogel v. [read post]
