Search for: "Ortiz v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 527
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2007, 7:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 11:03 pm
Plaintiff obtained a state-issued identification card as Ortiz, but he ultimately threw it out; eventually, he became a lawful resident alien. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 6:04 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 7:03 am
Justice Kagan delivered the opinion of the Court in Ortiz v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 3:46 pm
The petitioners also place reliance upon a report by Special Referee Tripp in Matter of Leahy v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am
United States, 13-7394; Ortiz-Zape v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 3:19 pm
In Anarkali Boutique, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 4:27 am
Rost v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 9:25 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently weighed in on the scope of the United States Supreme Court’s influential opinion in Stern v. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 10:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2009, 7:43 am
See United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 11:11 am
Circuit in Ortiz-Diaz v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 6:30 am
In Lomax v. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
Plaintiffs in the action allege that the creation of this new position was arbitrary, capricious and unlawful, that it violated their state and federal constitutional equal protection and due process rights and that DOCCS violated Article V, §6, the Merit and Fitness Clause, of the New York State's Constitution. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
Plaintiffs in the action allege that the creation of this new position was arbitrary, capricious and unlawful, that it violated their state and federal constitutional equal protection and due process rights and that DOCCS violated Article V, §6, the Merit and Fitness Clause, of the New York State's Constitution. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 11:11 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 12:12 pm
But all we got this morning was a unanimous decision in Lomax v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:23 am
The appeal in the First Circuit's recent opinion in United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 11:00 am
Ortiz on September 6, 2012 · Posted in Jurisdiction,Stern Files COURTESY OF WEIL GOTSHAL & MANGES Bankruptcy Blog The Advisory Committee on Bankruptcy Rules for the Judicial Conference of the United States has proposed amendments to Bankruptcy Rules 7008, 7012, 7016, 9027, and 9033 in an attempt to address some of the inefficiencies that the Supreme Court’s Stern v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 6:33 am
Reina, 495 U.S. 676 (1990), Ortiz-Barraza v. [read post]
