Search for: "PITTS V. STATE" Results 161 - 180 of 312
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am by INFORRM
That will simply not be acceptable.simply not be acceptable.” Research & resources New publications ‘Freedom of Information and the seven year itch’ – by Timothy Pitt-Payne QC, 11KBW, a paper at the 11KBW Information law seminar on 15th March 2012. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:41 pm
These include: Victoria Beckham v Bauer, where Mrs Beckham commenced proceedings in respect of the publication of a story concerning invented telephone calls and text messages between herself and her husband David Beckham; and Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie v New Group Newspapers, where the couple commenced proceedings against the publisher of News of the World concerning a story which detailed their alleged visit to a divorce lawyer in December 2009 at which time they… [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:45 am by GPL
 The discretionary function exception is limited, the Court stated, to "basic governmental policy decisions," and they key issue is the difference between design & day-to-day operational decisions v. policy decisions. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm by Bexis
Phelan, 9 F.3d 882, 887 (10th Cir. 1993) (“[a]s a federal court, we are generally reticent to expand state law without clear guidance from its highest court”); Aclys International v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 2:14 am by Rachit Buch
The process to be followed in Article 8 claims is straightforward, and is summarised by Immigration Judge Pitt in this case at paragraph 15, which mentions the leading case of R (Razgar) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 27. [read post]
’[3] On the question of domestic law the Court finds that ‘the law of the United States has been uniform since its founding that corporations can be held liable for the torts committed by their agents. [read post]
The article dissects the legal reasoning of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum[1] and argues that the majority simply got it wrong principally by conflating ‘the jurisdictional and cause of action aspects of an ATS suit’. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 5:07 pm by pgbarnes
McGinley’s complaint states that Kotz’s tactics “have caused SEC employees to fear the OIG’s false allegations and retaliations. [read post]