Search for: "People v. Irvin" Results 161 - 180 of 228
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2020, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
The ICO has set out how seven of the UK’s political parties need to improve the way they handle people’s personal data after assessing how they manage data protection. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Nor does the consumer’s lack of understanding have to be reasonable, and there is no required threshold number of people who lacked understanding.[24] Further, a consumer may have a lack of understanding even if he or she is generally aware that a particular consequence may follow—e.g., he or she may be aware of the consequence, but may not understand either the magnitude or likelihood of a particular risk.[25] Evidence of lack of understanding can include direct evidence,… [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 3:32 pm by Caleb Mason
Dean Erwin Chemerinsky of University of California, Irvine School of Law has agreed to serve as counsel of record. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
  Mr Wright has sued a number of people in the crypto industry in an apparent campaign to prove that he is Satoshi Nakamoto, the mysterious and anonymous inventor of Bitcoin. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Arguing for the federal government in the case of United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
In a similar vein, Equifax has been fined £500,000 by the ICO (the press release can be found here and Equifax’s response here) for its failure to protect the personal data of over 15 million people in the UK following a breach in 2017. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 7:06 am
He has also been able to attract a pool of dedicated and talented people to support FTI’s continued growth. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
Bickel’s account – essentially, to emphasize the principles underlying the 14th Amendment and its capacity for growth, rather than how people at the time understood it – is of a piece with one of the ways originalists try to save their approach from generating unacceptable conclusions. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 9:29 pm by RegBlog
“Objective reasonableness” is an appropriate touchstone for regulating force, but the ill-informed Graham v. [read post]