Search for: "People v. Childs"
Results 161 - 180
of 6,950
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2021, 12:39 pm
”’” (Id. at p. 382, quoting Graham, supra, 560 U.S. at p. 69 and Kennedy v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 4:38 pm
California courts have held that possession of multiple images of child pornography constitute only a single act of possession (People v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 12:05 pm
You don't see many 82-page opinions by the California Court of Appeal in run-of-the-mill child molestation cases. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 6:37 pm
Ames v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 10:07 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Lee v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 7:27 pm
Florida and Graham v. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 9:01 pm
But the Court’s religiosity also emerges in nominally non-religion controversies, including Dobbs v. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 5:53 am
It reached this amount by dividing the $60,000 requested by six, which is the total number of people that the mother testified had been caught possessing a pornographic image of the daughter. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 6:33 am
The primary goal of this Article is to help expose those structural issues and the ethically troublesome practices of adoption attorneys as the most important Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) case in history, Brackeen v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 1:19 pm
Defendant Villa is 28 and his girlfriend (and the mother of his child) is 18. [read post]
18 May 2010, 9:41 am
[Baures v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 8:26 am
By Eric Goldman People v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 2:29 pm
Hammon v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 6:15 pm
See, People v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 5:14 pm
People v. [read post]
16 Feb 2019, 5:31 pm
A good illustration of a situation where a court refuses to modify a New York child support agreement is in the case, D.C. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 6:32 am
Ct. 1990); In re Child of: R.L.Z. and R.G.L, 2009 Minn. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 1:16 pm
I think that you can figure out how this case comes out based solely upon two facts:(1) the fact that it's in front of the California Supreme Court; and(2) the fact that the first sentence of the opinion begins: "Defendant Alphonso Howard was sentenced to death after a jury convicted him of first degree murder, rape, and a forcible lewd act upon a child under the age of 14. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 4:59 pm
That was the issue in People v. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 3:07 pm
Here are some of the presumptively invalid reasons under CCP 231.7(e): (1) Expressing a distrust of or having a negative experience with law enforcement or the criminal legal system.(2) Expressing a belief that law enforcement officers engage in racial profiling or that criminal laws have been enforced in a discriminatory manner.(3) Having a close relationship with people who have been stopped, arrested, or convicted of a crime.(4) A prospective juror's neighborhood.(5)… [read post]
