Search for: "People v. Mitchell" Results 161 - 180 of 624
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2008, 1:13 pm
The woman, Holly Mitchell, lived with a convicted sex offender and let her children stay with the man while she was at work.Mitchell appealed her conviction, claiming the state's law is unconstitutional because it treats people who are not married and living with a sex offender differently than people who are married and living with a sex offender.The Supreme Court on Friday rejected that argument, saying it's reasonable to believe that an unmarried parent living… [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:06 pm
As the bank loudly promises to restore consumer trust, Wells Fargo is quietly insisting that defrauded customers should be barred from holding it accountable in court by pointing to “ripoff clauses” buried deep in its contracts.Customers represented in Mitchell v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:06 pm
As the bank loudly promises to restore consumer trust, Wells Fargo is quietly insisting that defrauded customers should be barred from holding it accountable in court by pointing to “ripoff clauses” buried deep in its contracts.Customers represented in Mitchell v. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm by Paula Mitchell
” They convinced voters that the death penalty was needed to punish people like “Richard ‘The Night Stalker’ Ramirez [who] kidnapped, raped, tortured and mutilated 14 people and terrorized 11 more including children and senior citizens. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 11:28 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Federal Court of Oregon expert in U.S. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
Rybolovlev admitted that it’s hard for him to trust people, but once he does, he trusts them entirely. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 12:45 pm by Jeralyn
We've seen the hard way in the Citizens United case and campaign finance and in Bush v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 3:47 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Such a claim was successful in People v Mitchell (2010 NY Slip Op 06926 [4th Dept 10/01/10]) in which the Court held thatThe evidence at trial established only that defendant constructively possessed the firearms with respect to the criminal possession of a weapon counts of which he was convicted, and thus the People proved only a single actus reus (see People v Laureano, 87 NY2d 640, 643; People v Hunt, 52 AD3d 1312, lv denied… [read post]