Search for: "People v. Spellings" Results 161 - 180 of 1,014
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2015, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
The case which has most recently looked at section 106 of the Representation of the People Act 1983 (RPA) is Watkins v Woolas ([2010] EWHC 2702(QB)). [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 1:28 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Indeed, standing alone, the documents shed no light on defendant's guilt or innocence as ruled in People v Damato and People v Bush. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 7:05 am by Benjamin Wittes
Indeed, when Mouhanad's family had to suddenly leave Syria, they all stayed at our house for a spell until they got a place of their own. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 10:26 am
The situation most people are familiar with is that related to automobile insurance coverage. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 4:30 am by John-Paul Boyd
And yet people without counsel should be able to access out-of-court dispute resolution processes just as they access in-court processes. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 8:58 am by Adam Feldman
Many people seems to be wondering how Judge Brett Kavanaugh will vote in abortion cases if confirmed to the Supreme Court, and more specifically if he will vote to overturn Roe v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 2:16 pm
 A regime that said (1) we can -- and affirmatively want to -- stop people from filing contradictory complaints in the first place, and a district court can permissibly do that, but (2) once a contradictory complaint is filed, we have to let it go forward; well, such a regime would make no sense. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 3:17 am by Lyle Denniston
The Trump team volunteered to submit its new Title VII brief in the Second Circuit Court case (Zarda v. [read post]