Search for: "People v. Stevens" Results 161 - 180 of 2,927
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2010, 9:26 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) In the free speech / dogfighting video case, United States v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 2:28 pm by Erin Miller
I was intrigued by a number of things: Stevens had served for decades on the federal bench almost completely out of the spotlight; despite knowing Kerner, Stevens had written a stinging dissent in a case (McNally v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 6:17 am
"  Here is how it starts:Last week, in Danforth v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 11:54 am by Mark Tabakman
In a recent posting in the MS & K Employment Alert, Steven Schneider and Ivan Perkins wrote about the recent Supreme Court decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 8:29 am
I’m glad people caught the error in Justice Scalia’s EPA v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 2:00 am by Christopher Tyner
  In 1976, Stevens joined the plurality opinion in Gregg v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 11:27 pm
A donation link was created on the website, through which people could contribute money into PayPal accounts created in the names and identification numbers of individuals other than Steven or Bartholomew but linked to the brothers' bank accounts. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 3:59 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
" 70,000 people in the US are over 100. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:38 pm by Donald Thompson
 With respect to grand jury proceedings, the district attorney has a “duty of fair dealing to the accused” (People v Pelchat, 62 NY2d 97, 105 [1984]; see also, People v Lancaster, 69 NY2d 20, 26 [1986]) and to the court (People v Ianniello, 21 NY2d 418, 424 [1968]). [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 12:46 am
United States, No. 05-1272, issued 3/27/2007), Justice Stevens (Massachusetts v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 4:42 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: In an excerpt from his new book, reprinted in The Washington Post, retired Justice John Paul Stevens discusses the Second Amendment and proposes an addition to the amendment which would provide that “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms when serving in the Militia shall not be infringed. [read post]