Search for: "People v. Wilde"
Results 161 - 180
of 760
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2017, 3:09 pm
Quester v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 4:49 am
Lacking the mad skillz of Yale law students to know with absolute certainty that the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh for the Supreme Court means “people will die,” it seemed prudent to consider what Judge Kavanaugh had actually said or written in the past rather than to assume he would reverse Roe v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 12:02 pm
Q: Garcia v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:01 pm
Moving forward to Tuesday 16 September, the joint IPKat and IP Finance dialogue between Kat-blogger Neil Wilkof and Intellectual Asset Management editor Joff Wild about patent values and how patent litigation affects them now has 33 people signed up -- so there's plenty of room if you're curious to attend. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 8:45 am
NCAA and National Collegiate Athletic Association v. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 4:23 am
The Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 8:56 pm
” Pottawattamie Cnty. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 11:01 am
Rodriguez v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 7:05 am
Mann v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 12:43 pm
Also, the court’s opinion starts with this line from Oscar Wilde: “It is a curious fact that people are never so trivial as when they take themselves seriously. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 11:58 am
Five or six people have donated to AASE. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:32 pm
“A show about the law and the nine Supreme Court justices who interpret it for the rest of America,” episodes of note include The Fear of Too Much Justice on how the Supreme Court and the justice system treat people of color, the poor, and the sick and The Family Roe featuring a conversation with Joshua Prager who investigated and wrote a book on Roe v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 5:10 am
In Folkens v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 10:46 am
This was a wild statutory reading that I believe no other court has agreed with. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 3:34 am
| BREAKING: Unanimous Supreme Court in Samsung v Apple finds that damages may be based on a component, not whole product | (Belatedly) remembering Raymond Niro, the most influential person in patent litigation whom you may have never heard of | Genuine use of three dimensional EU trade marks - heated arguments over ovens | Wild Boys Sometimes Lose It: Duran Duran fail to reclaim their US copyright |Around the IP Blogs Photo credit: Steve Jurvetson [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:00 am
In the London Review of Books, but behind a paywall, are a review of Entick v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 10:28 am
Lowenguth was "good people" and like "family. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 7:19 pm
In People v Schreier, 22 NY3d 494 [2014], the Court made clear that surreptitiousness is a separate and distinct element from whether the recording was done without the subject’s knowledge or consent, and is also separate and distinct from the requirement that the recording took place in a location where the subject had a reasonable expectation of privacy (both of which are also required by the statute). [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:08 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 5:10 am
In Folkens v. [read post]
