Search for: "Powers v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 36,296
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2025, 11:18 am
Law v. [read post]
1 Mar 2025, 8:20 am
Compared to the definitions from Nguyen or the Second Circuit’s Meyer v. [read post]
1 Mar 2025, 6:04 am
I am reflecting with gratitude on the way that they, and so many of their compatriots, have demonstrated through words and action what it means to retain hope, as Václav Havel described it, in situations where hopelessness is an ever-present risk. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 11:56 am
Ct. 926 (Mem.) (2021); United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 9:12 am
Zubik v City of Pittsburgh, 2025 WL 471533 (W.D. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 9:10 am
Beck won a case titled United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 7:45 am
The very next day, the Court decided 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 6:31 am
[1] Under Chevron v. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 6:31 am
[1] Under Chevron v. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 5:00 am
That’s one powerful opinion piece. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 4:00 am
The Court first held that the reliance by the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals (OCCA) on the state's Post-Conviction Procedures Act (PCPA) to bar Glossip's effort to have his conviction reversed was not an independent state law ground that deprives SCOTUS of the power to review the decision because the OCCA's PCPA ruling was itself based on an evaluation of the strength of Glossip's underlying federal claims. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 3:12 am
Those in power must be listening. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 1:51 am
Turning to the interpretation of these autonomous criteria under Article 25, the Court confirmed the validity of asymmetric jurisdiction clauses designating courts of EU Member States or States that are parties to the Lugano Convention. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 2:24 pm
A dozen years before Congress proposed the Twenty-Second Amendment, the Supreme Court decided Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 2:15 pm
[That's the powerful argument that Mayor Adams's lawyers are making, citing (among other grounds) the leaking of a resignation letter containing "the wildly inflammatory and false accusation that Mayor Adams and his counsel had, in essence, offered a quid to the Department of Justice in exchange for the quo of dismissal. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 12:53 pm
Gartenberg argues that under Healy v. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 10:04 am
The court stated that the City’s conduct in this regard was inimical to the rule of law and constituted a failure by the City to discharge its constitutional obligations. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 5:48 am
The legal issue in Holtzman v. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 4:05 am
In Barnett v. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 4:00 am
In Jensen v. [read post]