Search for: "Price v. Price"
Results 161 - 180
of 18,247
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2013, 9:45 am
LUNDBECK: WHY DRUG MERGERS MAY NOT RAISE PRICES. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 2:39 pm
This rule was created through the case of Price v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 8:48 am
In December 2006, the Supreme Court granted cert in Leegin v PSKS. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:11 am
Supreme Court has declined to review Feesers, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 6:47 am
In DFC Global Corporation v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 3:00 am
Here is the abstract: In Price [v. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 11:23 am
Defining Cost or Pricing Data TINA defines cost or pricing data to include “all facts that, as of the date of agreement on price … or … another date agreed upon between the parties, a prudent buyer or seller would reasonably expect to affect price negotiations significantly. [read post]
24 May 2023, 3:55 pm
Elements of a Defective Pricing Claim There are five essential elements of a defective pricing claim. [read post]
16 Sep 2012, 5:10 pm
In Minn-Chem, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2006, 12:18 pm
In Water Craft Management LLC v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 12:12 pm
Oct. 10, 2014); Chen v. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 5:35 pm
Plaintiffs sued Vedder Price in 2014. [read post]
17 May 2007, 3:46 am
In UMG v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 6:57 am
However, the rep advised that to get around that problem, “[v]erbal communication between producers and shippers must therefore be organized. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 8:54 am
DP18/9 is focused on the following practices: firms charging different prices to different consumers based solely on differences in consumers’ price sensitivity (also known as ‘price discrimination’); and firms charging existing customers higher prices than new customers (sometimes referred to as ‘loyalty pricing’ or ‘inertia pricing’). [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 10:55 am
This concern exists in spite of the fact that the Supreme Court in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2024, 4:00 am
Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (1996), 66 C.P.R. (3d) 45, 108 F.T.R. 190, aff’d [1997] 1 F.C. 32, 119 F.T.R. 70 (C.A.); Manitoba Society of Seniors Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 9:23 am
Acadia Motors, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 5:36 am
Arizona v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 5:49 pm
Smith Wholesale Co., Inc. v. [read post]
