Search for: "Query v. U.s.*"
Results 161 - 180
of 204
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2020, 12:34 pm
The app would have included a database of reported clients that workers could query before engaging with a potential client, and would notify others nearby when a sex worker reported being in trouble. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 8:42 am
Queries from Ginsburg, Sotomayor and Kagan also confirmed open minds. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:18 am
In NLRB v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 9:21 am
(Google LLC v. [read post]
Constructive Ambiguity of the Budapest Memorandum at 28: Making Sense of the Controversial Agreement
7 Feb 2023, 5:31 am
The security request was especially acute due to Russia’s constant pretensions over Crimea following the collapse of the U.S.S.R. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
Similarly, the SEC and the other regulatory users of CAT have little incentive to be judicious in their use of CAT queries.[5] The SROs, which in the funding model before us today bear a third of the cost, do care about constraining costs.[6] They have pushed back on certain elements of the plan and are even litigating with us on some features of CAT. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 2:04 pm
In US v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 10:00 pm
See Thompson v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 7:04 pm
In Taylor v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:45 am
Tamburo v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 5:10 am
Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 10:27 am
Patton explains that all of the accompanying documents address Section 702 of FISA, that no documents responsive to the query have been withheld, and that within the week he will provide an estimate of when the next batch of documents will be ready. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 10:26 am
Briggs (1986) and Kalina v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 5:00 am
At a sentencing conference, when the court queried why the government had provided the Folk Nation information, the prosecutor cited his "obligation to bring to the court all of the information that was known to it about this defendant" and so that the court could consider it under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 8:53 am
Still, it seems crass to come right out and say so, as opposed to saying that the scientists are querying the data to see whether they are compatible with the null hypothesis. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:43 am
” United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 2:47 pm
In the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 3:32 pm
Katz v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 9:43 am
Handel further argued that Schneider v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 8:32 am
Another FDA power grab failed in the face of decades of non-use of purported agency authority in FDA v. [read post]
