Search for: "Rick Pildes"
Results 161 - 180
of 225
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2016, 7:12 am
Lyle Denniston covered the oral argument for this blog, with other coverage coming from Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal; commentary on the issues involved in the case comes from Rick Pildes at Balkinization. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 7:00 am
References: Accounting Board Challenged in Court by Fawn John Johnson and Jess Bravin in The Wall Street Journal False claims by Government to Supreme Court: PCAOB agency more powerful and independent than alleged by Hans Bader The Structure of Government and Today's Argument in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Case by Rick Pildes in Balkinization Considerations of PCAOB Posted by David Zaring in The Conglomerate Sarbanes-Oxley and its devilish details by Lyle Denniston in the SCOTUS… [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 3:01 am
In another post at the Election Law Blog, Rick Pildes looks ahead to next month’s oral argument in Evenwel v. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 7:33 am
Unfortunately, this hasn't happened and according to Rick Hasen's recent article "The Untimely Death of Bush v. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
” Rick Pildes has aptly described this provision as a loaded weapon, lying around for an unscrupulous state legislature to invoke. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:51 am
” At Balkinization, Rick Pildes predicts that, if the Court strikes down the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 7:10 am
Looking further forward, Balkinization's Rick Pildes previews Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 12:22 pm
In a recent post at the Election Law blog, prominent election law and constitutional law scholars Ned Foley, Michael McConnell, Derek Muller, Rick Pildes, and Brad Smith, summarize the bill's strengths and urge Congress to swiftly pass it: Here are the main features of the draft, which are a vast improvement on the existing Act from 1887. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 9:42 am
Update: Also at Lawfare, Rick Pildes argues that government silence undermines terrorism policies – an observation that I agree with, and which I make in similar terms at Lawfare as part of a comment on the possible operational role of the CIA in Afghanistan once US combat forces are formally gone. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 9:31 am
" The "logic" of our political order and the "separation of parties, not powers" (as Rick Pildes and Daryl (no relation) Levinson our it, is that an opposition party has no reason whatsoever to cooperate (or, in their language, "collaborate," with a president of the opposite party, for the simple reason that president's will pick up (at least) 90% of the credit for any accomplishments. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 11:07 am
As Professors Rick Pildes and Daryl Levinson observed in an important article, the result is that the system does not operate according to the Madisonian theory of checks and balances: when the Presidency and Congress are controlled by the same party, there is insufficient checking; when we have divided government, there is too much. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 11:05 am
Gerken contrasts her “internalist” account of Windsor with “psychoanalytic” ones offered by scholars such as Rick Pildes, Michael Klarman, Mary Dudziak, and myself. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 1:13 pm
Like Rick Pildes (himself borrowing from earlier political scientists), Aldrich also emphasizes the collapse of the schizoid Democratic Party following the Voting Rights Act of 1965, when the “big tent” of Northern liberals and Southern white racists disappeared, with many of the latter, of course, migrating to the Republican Party in the aftermath of Barry Goldwater’s vote against the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and, more importantly, Richard… [read post]
15 May 2020, 3:56 am
” At the Election Law Blog, Rick Pildes pushes back against the electors’ argument that chaos might also result from a ruling for the states, explaining why “[t]he Court should feel free to resolve the cases without any concern that permitting states to bind their electors creates any meaningful risk, even if we ever face, for the first time, a situation in which a winning candidate dies in the 5-6 weeks between the election and the meeting of the Electoral… [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:19 am
At the Election Law Blog, Rick Pildes observes that “[d]eciding to hear the Maryland case is a significant signal that a majority of the Court is not going to hold partisan gerrymandering claims to be non-justiciable (that is, inappropriate for judicial resolution)” in the first partisan-gerrymandering case this term, Gill v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:14 am
Reacting to this report, Rick Pildes of Balkinization considers whether public financing of elections “actually encourages greater polarization, as seems to have been the case in [Arizona.] [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 1:11 pm
Re (@RichardMRe) October 2, 2022 Relatedly, there are Rick Pildes's and Orin Kerr's earlier posts about the concept of judicial courage. [read post]
9 May 2010, 11:56 pm
” This picks up an idea that I think was first suggested a few days ago by Rick Pildes over at Balkinization. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 2:16 pm
But as Rick Pildes and Daryl (no relation) Levinson accurate have pointed out, it's "separation of parties," not of powers, that define our system in most important respects. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 3:31 am
" And, in a similar vein (though not with regard to the Establishment Clause), Rick Pildes has voiced the worry that "in the political realm, judges and others cling . . . tenaciously to the fear that too much politics, or too competitive a political system, will bring instability, fragmentation, and disorder. [read post]
