Search for: "Roberts v. Curtis" Results 161 - 180 of 212
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia Judgment was handed down in favour of the applicant in CURTIS v JASON VICTOR BISHOP TRADING AS CANBERRA NOTICE BOARD (Civil Dispute) [2022] ACAT 59 over defamatory material that was published on the Canberra Notice Board Facebook group between 15 June 2020 to 15 July 2020. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
Brunsting, Stephen Brusell, Mark Bryan, David Bryant, Eulonda Bryant, Robert Bryant, Displaced Bubba, Byron Buckley, Carl Buhlman, Richard Burke, Erik Burrows, Randy Bush, Jay Buxton, Phyllis Byrd, Marie Cajuste, Joseph T Calhoon, Michelle Calhoun, Brian Callaghan, Mandy Camden, Heidi Campbell, Tom Campbell, Pedro Canahuati, Mike Canavan, Nicholas Cancelliere, Julia Cannon, Eric Cantor, Sam Cao, Linda Cappuccio, Britt Carlile, Tirzah Carpio, Josh Carrico, Jason Cash, Jim Cashion, Chris… [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
If you just blithely ignore it, and publish the story despite having been told that it may well be mistaken, that would be textbook "reckless disregard," which would allow liability even in a public official case: Consider, for instance, Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
[1]Legal scholar Curtis Bradley is the leading proponent of this methodology, with a forthcoming book on the topic [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:27 am
A post on the Fashion+IP LinkedIn site by Lee Curtis (Harrison Goddard Foote) had this Kat puzzled last week. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
(That count also includes current members of the Court such as John Roberts, Elena Kagan, and Sonia Sotomayor, though the latter has recently signed a contract to write a book.) [read post]
29 May 2012, 8:08 pm
Over on Paid Content, the excellent Jeff John Roberts reports on an Arizona man’s attempt to obtain a judicial declaration that the word “Google” is generic and that, therefore, the company’s trade marks for internet search are invalid (a katpat to Lee Curtis for spotting this). [read post]