Search for: "STANFORD v. STATE" Results 161 - 180 of 2,035
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by Julia Englebert
Under this theory, the Supreme Court held in American Electric Power v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
Candidate, Stanford University), Nicholas T. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 9:43 am
The lawsuit, National Veterans Legal Services Program, et al. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 4:44 am by Karen Tani
Tanner Allread (Stanford University) writes about "Brackeen and the Value of Careful History. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 11:00 am by Guest Blogger
Tanner Allread  On June 15, Indian Country breathed a collective sigh of relief when the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Indian Child Welfare Act in Haaland v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Congress has been very clear in the federal securities laws when it intends to preempt state law, such as in the National Securities Markets Improvement Act[44] or the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act.[45] Indeed, such a broad claim of Commission authority might raise issues under the major questions doctrine discussed in West Virginia v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
"  The recording of the Supreme Court Historical Society’s commemoration of Juneteenth, a “conversation on the lynching of Ed Johnson in 1906 and United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 5:25 am by Kevin LaCroix
Frankel quotes Stanford Law School Professor Joseph Grundfest as saying that there “is no such thing” as a federal derivative action under Section 14(a). [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  I first became aware of this in a brilliant essay by Stanford historian Jonathan Gnienapp that was published in a book that I edited on nullification and secession in contemporary constitutional theory. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 3:30 am by Liz Dunshee
Stated differently, these derivative suits concern internal corporate affairs—matters that are traditionally governed by state corporate law and, therefore, more sensibly litigated in the Delaware Chancery. [read post]