Search for: "Smith v. Superior Court"
Results 161 - 180
of 817
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2023, 3:41 am
The court will consider the question: can a Rent Repayment Order only be made against an immediate landlord or can a superior landlord also be liable? [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 3:18 pm
In Barboza, Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge William F. [read post]
30 May 2024, 7:34 am
The Court applied the holding in State v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:04 pm
The decision reinstates the charges against Cheryl Oddi-Smith in Marion Superior Court. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 6:14 pm
Superior Court, 42 Cal. 4th 443 (2007). [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 2:52 pm
Wolfson who figures so prominently in Smith v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 9:11 am
Smith v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 7:27 am
The recent Ontario Superior Court trial decision of Justice Arthur Gans in Kates Estate v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 8:43 pm
Smith & Nephew filed its own cert petition (here), also asking the Supreme Court to reverse the Federal Circuit. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 10:10 am
For publication opinions today (3): Smith & Wesson Corp., et al & United States of America v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 4:20 am
In the non-precedential decision by the Pennsylvania Superior Court in the case of Smith v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 1:21 am
Canada On 1 June 2023, the Superior Court of Justice Divisional Court handed down judgment in Corion v Plummer, 2023 ONSC 3249. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 12:25 pm
Smith, Valentino & Smith, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 10:00 am
On Wednesday, March 25, 2009, the Delaware Supreme Court issued an opinion reversing the Chancery Court's decision in Ryan v. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 7:23 pm
Justice Rady of the Superior Court outlined the public interest purpose of the anti-SLAPP provisions, but also relied extensively on the 2015 decision of Baglow v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 5:07 am
Comparison with Ross and Joyner The Smith Court considered State v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 10:18 am
For the London Free Press – October 3, 2011 Read this on Canoe ONLINE: ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT DECISION DOES NOT MEAN YOU CAN SAY WHATEVER YOU WANT WITH IMPUNITY The Ontario Superior Court recently decided that a blog comment must pass a higher threshold before it’s considered defamatory than statements made in other places. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:54 am
"Reviewing the caselaw cited by the defense in its moving papers, the Pike County court agreed that both the Superior Court of Pennsylvania and the federal courts have held that debris on the roadway that originated from, or were caused by, a vehicle to come upon the roadway did not trigger coverage.More specifically, in the case of Smith v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 10:57 am
Williams v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 5:02 am
On appeal, he argued that the Wake County Superior Court Judge who presided over the trial “erred in allowing testimony of a detective concerning his opinions, decisions, observations, and interpretation of text messages” and that the judge also erred in admitting photographs of certain text messages. [read post]
