Search for: "Smith v. Superior Court" Results 161 - 180 of 830
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2022, 5:28 am by Dennis Crouch
Smith & Nephew (Supreme Court 2022) The Supreme Court issued a major opinion in this case back in 2021, holding  that the IPR scheme was unconstitutional because it placed administrative patent judges in the role of entering final decisions that were unreviewable by any superior executive officer. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 10:56 am by Adam Klasfeld
Note-1: Ex-Department of Justice official Jeff Clark, who was formerly CC4, was dropped in the superseding indictment as a co-conspirator following the Supreme Court’s ruling in Trump v. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 3:18 pm
In Barboza, Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge William F. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 3:41 am by Matrix Law
The court will consider the question: can a Rent Repayment Order only be made against an immediate landlord or can a superior landlord also be liable? [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:04 pm
The decision reinstates the charges against Cheryl Oddi-Smith in Marion Superior Court. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 7:27 am by Richard Worsfold
The recent Ontario Superior Court trial decision of Justice Arthur Gans in Kates Estate v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 8:43 pm by Scott McKeown
Smith & Nephew filed its own cert petition (here), also asking the Supreme Court to reverse the Federal Circuit. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 10:10 am
For publication opinions today (3): Smith & Wesson Corp., et al & United States of America v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 4:20 am
In the non-precedential decision by the Pennsylvania Superior Court in the case of Smith v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 1:21 am by INFORRM
Canada On 1 June 2023, the Superior Court of Justice Divisional Court handed down judgment in Corion v Plummer, 2023 ONSC 3249. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 10:00 am
On Wednesday, March 25, 2009, the Delaware Supreme Court issued an opinion reversing the Chancery Court's decision in Ryan v. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 7:23 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Justice Rady of the Superior Court outlined the public interest purpose of the anti-SLAPP provisions, but also relied extensively on the 2015 decision of Baglow v. [read post]