Search for: "Sosa v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 209
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2024, 6:50 pm
The Court concluded there were extensive human rights violations and ordered the State to provide specialized medical assistance to the victims, pay compensation for both material losses and pain and suffering, and publicly acknowledge its wrongdoing. [read post]
17 Dec 2006, 2:19 pm
Dhooge, Lohengrin Revealed: The Implications of Sosa v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm
A 2004 Supreme Court decision, Sosa v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 10:12 am
The same point can be made regarding Sosa v. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 6:05 am
In Doe v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 8:00 am
First, it is true that Sosa v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 8:43 pm
” Repeatedly invoking the Supreme Court’s call for caution in Sosa, the Court emphasizes that the ATS is “no license for judicial innovation” and that “judicial restraint is demanded. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
First, the US Supreme Court hearings in Kiobel v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 11:01 am
See, e.g., Matar v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 3:49 pm
On the contrary, one of the main obligations it imposes on states is to protect against human rights abuses committed by non-state actors, including corporations. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:01 am
In AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 9:34 am
Yet, in Sosa v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:44 am
In Sosa v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 2:47 pm
Suits will be dismissed if the state is an indispensable party under Republic of Philippines v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 1:17 pm
Moreover, the causes of action under the ATS, the Supreme Court’s 2004 language in Sosa v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 5:52 pm
Innovations LLC v. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 9:53 pm
For a couple of reasons, the presumption against extraterritoriality doesn’t apply neatly to ATS claims, as the Ninth and DC Circuits said in their 2011 decisions in Sarei v Rio Tinto and Doe VIII v Exxon Mobil. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
Is it an autonomous community, like a nation-state? [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 11:21 am
The scenario, then, was reasonably similar to that in the famous Alvarez-Machain case (see Sosa v Alvarez-Machain, 542 U.S. 692 (2004)). [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 10:47 am
Id. at 842, quoting Sosa v. [read post]
