Search for: "South Carolina v. Smith" Results 161 - 180 of 315
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2015, 5:38 am by Amy Howe
” Briefly: At Bloomberg Politics, Sahil Kapur reports that, during a South Carolina barbecue stop, potential presidential candidate Rick Perry used the pending same-sex marriage cases as an example “to sound the alarm about a hypothetical President Hillary Clinton appointing as many as four justices to the Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Dec 2024, 6:32 am by Phil Dixon
The defendant worked as the CEO of the Palmetto State Bank in South Carolina. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 2:17 pm by @travelblawg
Code § 39A “Aiming a laser pointer at an aircraft” in United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 10:50 am by Helen White
”  Unsurprisingly, then, as Hayward Smith explains in his own 2022 article, in the decade after ratification of the federal Constitution, every state except South Carolina to have had a constitutional convention adopted state constitutional provisions regulating federal elections. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Searle & Co., 979 F.2d 1001, 1003 (4th Cir. 1992) (applying South Carolina law); Muzichuck v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 6:53 am by John Elwood
But the court declined without comment to take up the state of South Carolina’s twice-relisted petition in Stirling v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
Aluminum Co. of America, 731 P.2d 1267, 1270 (Idaho 1986).South Carolina: Madison v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Carolina Foam Industries, Inc., 935 P.2d 876, 883, (Ariz. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am
Verret (George Mason University), and Greg Lawrence (Lawrence Law), on Monday, April 29, 2024 Tags: Insider trading, Punawat, SEC, SEC v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am
Verret (George Mason University), and Greg Lawrence (Lawrence Law), on Monday, April 29, 2024 Tags: Insider trading, Punawat, SEC, SEC v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 12:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
(South Carolina) (holding the proper measure of compensation is the difference between the land unencumbered by a railroad easement and the land encumbered by an easement for recreational trail use and railbanking). [read post]