Search for: "South Dakota v. Robert" Results 161 - 180 of 249
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2016, 7:36 am by Robert Kreisman
In this case, Johnson & Johnson was ordered to pay a total of $55 million to Gloria Ristesund of South Dakota. [read post]
12 May 2016, 7:36 am by Robert Kreisman
In this case, Johnson & Johnson was ordered to pay a total of $55 million to Gloria Ristesund of South Dakota. [read post]
12 May 2016, 7:36 am by Robert Kreisman
In this case, Johnson & Johnson was ordered to pay a total of $55 million to Gloria Ristesund of South Dakota. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:42 pm by Mark Walsh
The case arises from efforts by a South Dakota newspaper, the Argus Leader, to report on fraud in the federal food-stamp program, which is formally called the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, “or SNAP,” Gorsuch says snappily. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 5:15 pm
The Thomas More Society (Chicago, Illinois) submitted amicus briefs in both cases which included official abortion reporting data from six States (Indiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee and Virginia) whose partial-birth abortion statutes, drafted with far less precision than the federal Act, were not challenged prior to the Supreme Court's decision in Stenberg v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:34 pm by Josh Blackman
Here, the leading precedent in South Dakota v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
” At Medium, Nick Lum points out that the South Dakota attorney general, who represented the state in South Dakota v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 2:25 pm by Jennifer Papapanagiotou
Texas On January 18, 2022, the State of Texas filed a motion to dismiss its claims in Texas v. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 12:54 pm by Amy Howe
Today the justices announced that they would take on South Dakota v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 2:24 pm by Kim Zetter
Circuit courts in the 7th (covering Illinois, Wisconsin and Indiana), 8th (covering Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota) and 9th (covering Alaska, Arizona, California, Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, the Mariana Islands, Montana, Nevada, Oregon and Washington) all ruled prior to the Supreme Court case that warrantless GPS tracking was legal. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
South Dakota, she showed that she understood tax law better than anyone else on the Court. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 9:35 am by Ilya Shapiro
Indeed, the list of Section 5 jurisdictions is bizarre: six states of the Old Confederacy (and certain counties in three others), plus Alaska, Arizona, and counties or townships in other states ranging from New Hampshire to South Dakota. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 4:05 am
And two states (South Dakota and Colorado) will soon vote on initiatives that would effectively repeal abortion rights. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]