Search for: "State v. Grooms"
Results 161 - 180
of 433
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2020, 12:54 am
The appellant, Mark Sutherland, began corresponding on Grindr with a member of a PH group, Groom Resisters Scotland, posing as a thirteen year old boy (“the decoy”). [read post]
4 May 2016, 3:36 pm
Thompson (Prisoners – Grooming Policies) on May 2, 2016. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:53 am
R (NM) Secretary v of State for Justice [2011] EWHC 1816 - Read judgment This case concerned whether the prison authorities were in breach of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 and the Equality Act 2010 when they failed to conduct a form investigation into a sexual assault against a prisoner with learning disabilities, NM. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 3:26 pm
" The document stated that "The Groom Khaja Naseeruddin Syed age 30 solemnly proposes to marry Miss Nausheen Farnaz Ali and take her as my wife and agree to pay Mahr of $51,000 Later. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 3:39 pm
ACLU, Ashcroft v. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 5:13 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 4:22 pm
In a recent decision, Devore-Thompson v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 10:13 pm
” Gertz v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:39 am
Earlier this year, the Supreme Court held (Holt v. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 5:56 am
In Holt v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 9:15 am
Based on one federal court’s decision in Rogers v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 3:30 am
However, EEOC v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 3:30 am
However, EEOC v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 8:00 pm
V. [read post]
3 May 2016, 1:56 pm
Drilled into our collective heads since Simeone v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 8:30 am
United States. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:53 am
In Alexander v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 8:13 am
” Chief Justice McLaughlin stated: “The enterprise substantially enhanced the risk which lead to the wrongs of the Plaintiff-Respondents suffered. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 12:16 pm
US v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:38 am
As we have previously reported, in April 2018, the California Supreme Court issued a sweeping ruling in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
