Search for: "State v. Matthews" Results 161 - 180 of 3,328
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2024, 9:30 am by Guest Blogger
This post provides a brief update.On March 26, Food and Drug Administration v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 8:57 pm by Josh Blackman
One of the most thorough analyses of this issue came in Steve Vladeck's amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by centerforartlaw
This iterative process continued in countries like India and China, each factory adding its own interpretation and modifications along the way.[17] Wiesner stated, “One thing we’re always so amazed by is the creativity that comes out of the half of the process when producing an object [in a factory]. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 7:48 am by Doug Cornelius
Sources: Memorandum Opinion National Small Business United et al v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
It is now subject to the same test that Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart once used to identify pornography in the case Jacobellis v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm by Barbara Moreno
Malcolm Clark, Jr., ed., Pharisee Among Philistines:  The Diary of Judge Matthew P. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am by INFORRM
There was also an extension application by the Claimant and an application by the Defendant for strike out and/or summary judgment before HH Lewis in the case of Matthews v Wakefield Metropolitan District Council KB-2023-002991. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am by centerforartlaw
”[4] Matthew Butterick, an attorney for the artists alongside Joseph Saveri noted that the judge “sustained the plaintiffs’ core claim pertaining to direct copyright infringement” and expressed optimism in the claim’s path to trial and the ability to address the court’s concerns.[5] On November 29, 2023, the artists and their legal team submitted an amended complaint, 94 pages to the original complaint’s 44, adding seven artist-plaintiffs: Gerald… [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:45 am by INFORRM
On 14 February 2024 there was a strike out/summary judgment application in the case of Chowdhury-v-Secretary of State for the Home Department KB-2023-003368. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, judgment was handed down in Blake & Anor v Fox [2024] EWHC 146 (KB). [read post]