Search for: "State v. Board of County Commissioners" Results 161 - 180 of 778
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2014, 7:03 am by Joe Koncelik
Carroll County Board of Revision, BTA Case No. 94-M-454 (April 19, 1996); Hufford v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 6:23 am
The purpose of a private road condemnation action is to determine whether a landowner meets the statutory requirements that allow a board of county commissioners to exercise its very limited powers of eminent domain. [read post]
21 May 2007, 8:03 am
The case was Los Angeles County v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 1:27 am by Laura Sandwell
Woodland v Essex County Council, heard 3 – 4 July 2013. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
On the other hand, counseling letters may not be used as a subterfuge for avoiding initiating formal disciplinary action against a tenured individual.The decisions of the Commissioner of Education in Fusco v Jefferson County School District, CEd, 14,396, and Irving v Troy City School District, CEd 14,373, are instructive in this regard. [read post]
13 Aug 2016, 8:16 pm by Patricia Salkin
Perschbacher v Freeborn County Board of Commissioners, 2016 WL 4162776 (MN App. 8/8/2016)Filed under: Agricultural Uses, Current Caselaw, Special Use/Exception [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 5:22 pm by Gaëtan Gerville-Réache
Macomb County Board of Commissioners, 464 Mich. 726, 740, 629 N.W.2d 900 (2001) [misprinted as "464 US 726" in the court's opinion]. [read post]