Search for: "State v. Borough"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,112
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2022, 5:25 am
In the case of Donahue v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:00 pm
In Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea v Bafna-Louis, 2023 WL 2387385 (S.D.N.Y., 2023) the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (the “RBKC”) brought a petition for the return of CBL and Baby L to the United Kingdom pursuant to the Hague Convention. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 11:18 am
The Court of Appeal decision in R v Wandsworth London Borough Council, Ex parte O, R v Leicester City Council, Ex parte Bhikha [2000] 1 WLR 2539 held that if an applicant's need for care and attention is to any material extent made more acute by some circumstance other than the mere lack of accommodation and funds, then . . . he qualifies. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:42 am
Three decisions of the Administrative Appeals Chamber of the Upper Tribunal on HB matters stand out: SS v North East Lincolnshire Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 300 (AAC); MB v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (HB) [2011] UKUT 321 (AAC); MR v Bournemouth Borough Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 284 (AAC). [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:42 am
Three decisions of the Administrative Appeals Chamber of the Upper Tribunal on HB matters stand out: SS v North East Lincolnshire Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 300 (AAC); MB v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (HB) [2011] UKUT 321 (AAC); MR v Bournemouth Borough Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 284 (AAC). [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 1:53 pm
In that case, Frayne v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 6:31 am
During Tuesday’s oral argument in Borough of Duryea v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 1:26 pm
A July 2015 appellate court decision, State v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 1:23 pm
Right then, Harouki v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea [2007] EWCA Civ 1000. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 2:08 pm
Macattram v Camden London Borough Council (2012) QBD (Admin) On Lawtel but no on BAILII This is an interesting little problem involving the payment of Council Tax. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 2:08 pm
Macattram v Camden London Borough Council (2012) QBD (Admin) On Lawtel but no on BAILII This is an interesting little problem involving the payment of Council Tax. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:03 pm
The state of Alaska also claimed the Service failed to adequately respond to its public comments, as required by the Act’s state cooperation provisions. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 6:14 am
Borough of Palisades Park, 899 F. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 9:11 am
Inc. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 5:25 am
With at least one Small Claims Court in each of New York State's 62 counties--including at least one in each of New York City's five boroughs--filing a small claims case is easy. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 8:52 am
Remember Klumpp v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 3:10 am
In this instance, the emergency action taken by the appellant was in response to the state of the pier, combined with a fear of possible collapse from crowd-loading during events. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am
On 9 March 2011, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the joint appeal of Sienkiewicz v Grief (UK) Ltd; Knowsley MBC v Willmore [2011] UKSC 10. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 10:27 am
Judgments were also published in non-anyonmised form – see Doncaster v Haigh and Doncaster v Watson. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 5:01 am
So the LL has a discretion as to whether to proceed further.The other case the Court in Stafford considered was Forbes v Lambeth London Borough Council[2003] EWHC 222 (QB). [read post]
