Search for: "State v. Briggs"
Results 161 - 180
of 337
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2020, 1:02 am
Mr Hoskins QC states that it does. 14:37: Lord Briggs questions whether there may be cases where equality is equity and that equality of distribution is fair. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 8:20 am
., and Michael Farley v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:08 pm
Feaver Estate v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 12:39 pm
Briggs, 475 U.S. 335 (1986), should be reconsidered or clarified? [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 6:02 am
United States, 10-8659, Garcia v. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 2:07 pm
In Missouri v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:41 am
And in United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 7:29 am
In this respect, Lord Briggs commended the summary by Sales LJ in AAA v Unilever plc [2018] EWCA Civ 1532, para 36 (another challenge to jurisdiction on similar issues) that “A parent company will only be found to be subject to a duty of care in relation to an activity of its subsidiary if ordinary, general principles of the law of tort regarding the imposition of a duty of care on the part of the parent in favour of a claim are satisfied in the particular case”. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 7:04 am
While this may seem unjust, courts have also upheld the franchise tag as a valid practice. [25] Linebacker Wilbur Marshall challenged the validity by filing memorandum in federal court, where the designation was deemed fair and reasonable - the court stated that market conditions still favored players. [26] Seeing that the franchise tag is a valid practice, the players will have to seek a forum other than the courts to address their issue with the designation.… [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 3:59 pm
This important new decision is Creed-21 v. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:24 am
The five principles governing estoppel by convention were outlined in the decision of Briggs J in Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Benchdollar [2009] EWHC 1310 (Ch). [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
The Court of Appeal (Lords Justices Kitchin, Briggs and Christopher Clarke), at [2015] EWCA Civ 607 , then allowed ConvaTec's appeal and dismissed Smith & Nephew's cross-appeal. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 11:05 am
” Briggs v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 6:42 am
If you have any questions concerning the Briggs v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 12:41 am
It is arguable that Lord Hodge and Lord Briggs’ “subjective intention” test is more in line with the approach taken by the German courts in Östrogenblocker (applied by Hacon HHJ in the case at hand), which introduced a mental element based on foreseeability. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 9:30 pm
The National Security Archive et. al. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 9:28 am
Many thanks to Adrian Briggs for the tip-off. [read post]
18 Nov 2006, 7:07 am
State & Michael Rippo v State. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 11:17 pm
Nebraska and Pierce v. [read post]
