Search for: "State v. Family Child Care"
Results 161 - 180
of 3,130
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Family laws provide for child and spousal support but do not fully account for IPV. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 4:24 pm
In Camreta and Alford v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 10:57 am
Div. of Youth & Family Servs. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 12:37 pm
The court stated that given the importance and benefits of the mediation/arbitration process in resolving family matters, “[t]he decision of an arbitrator, particularly in child-related matters, is therefore entitled to significant deference by the courts” (Petersoo, CA, para. 35). [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 9:02 am
" She stated that "the child's remaining with his mother, who has been his primary care provider since his birth, in the United States will not result in the manifestation of these concerns, but an order of return to Spain would do so in this case. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 6:07 pm
In one corner of the legal universe is the Indiana based family of an adult child. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 10:39 am
Before ICWA, approximately one third of Native American/Alaska Native children were taken from their homes by state welfare agencies and private adoption agencies, and a shocking 85 percent of those children were placed outside of family or community care with non-Native people. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 5:45 am
"In that case, Kaho`ohanohano v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 5:00 am
A parent has a fundamental right to the care, custody, and control of his or her child. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 8:47 am
The Court found that Respondent brought the minor child to the United States to visit her family and initially planned to stay for four weeks, with petitioner’s permission. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 9:53 am
“We’d probably have to leave the state. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:27 pm
Thursday’s ruling in Haaland v. [read post]
13 Mar 2021, 5:26 am
” Wickham v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:39 am
After the child’s birth, Griffiths brought M.W. to her family home where she cared for the child with the help of her mother. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 7:14 pm
Recently, I came across a case, H.M. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 4:30 pm
The Wilson appellate distinguished the effect of Family Code section 3651 from the trial court's equitable jurisdiction to forever stay enforcement of the arrears, citing Jackson v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 10:38 am
When parents share joint custody of a child, MCL § 722.31 requires the family court to approve a change in the child’s domicile of greater than 100 miles or when the existing shared custody order prohibits moving the child out of state and the change moves the child out of state. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 7:34 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 10:00 pm
It is time for all states to embrace the idea that to whatever extent it retains a parental immunity doctrine, such doctrine should not bar an action by a minor child against their biological parent for damages arising from sexual abuse when the child is in foster care. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 12:57 pm
C.J.M. v. [read post]
